Absolutely, and I definitely don’t want to minimise that; just some feedback that gave me pause about using broad and gendered terms that can affect lots of people, women disproportionately, but also that broad strokes can be disenfranchising and frustrating.

…repetition of the talking points. Some women and girls are active users of path network (and dangerous roads) quite happily but in many cases are referred to by broad-brush ‘women and girls’ in a way that can feel dismissive or pigeonholes by gender. Just prompting some thinking - not criticism

At one point on one of the pics below there are 14 lanes of road. 14. Yes… 14. And still it’s gridlocked. When your politicians argue that one more lane will fix the traffic. They are lying. And they need to not be leading us. Because we need leadership that takes space away from cars and drivers.

After completing my listen-through of every episode of The Bugle back to the start (I started listening to 'current' eps few years ago), currently halfway through listening to all Last Post (incredible) — so let's say buddy cop pair: our Nish Kumar AND weightlifting / fitness guru Nish Kumar... 🫠

Deadline 9th October!

This Sunday, 11am to 2pm, at Pavilion Cafe, Meadows, Edinburgh. Your chance to try out this model of cargo bike and others.

Assuming the H there is ‘heck’ 😂

Think I agree with this until we get to 'mass transit', and then I sort of fall in line with it. Damn these influential urbanists! It was a war on British English, not cars, all along!

He gets the idea after the third time you’ve done it, mind 😂

Where does my trolling of anti-cycling motorists on Facebook reside on this alignment I wonder …uh-oh

hey siri show me the reform councillor for lower sidcup

Just the one photo as well. "Oh yes and here's where we hide the cave troll, Gary. Anyway..."

Flat earthers of the transport world.

what in the Colin Furze is happening under there