explore | Grilled Cheese

Join AMS Publications during #PeerReviewWeek to celebrate our AMS Editor's Award recipients and hear what they have to say about the impact of #PeerReview!

Learn more: https://bit.ly/4gPSmpB @peerreviewweek.bsky.social

Per @alicemeadows.bsky.social:
We don’t talk enough about the ethos of #PeerReview, why it’s a critical part of being a scholar/scientist — conversations about capacity likewise overlook its impact. importance as a form of community service
@scholarlykitchen.bsky.social
@peerreviewweek.bsky.social

For #PeerReviewWeek: researchers across career stages share how they approach reviewing — from deciding whether to accept, to reading strategy, to whether they sign their reviews.

🔗 Read "How to review a paper": https://bit.ly/4xUgLjn #PeerReview #AcademicPublishing

👀 The best peer review support is often the work nobody sees.

For #PeerReviewWeek, Kim Eggleton, Head of Peer Review and Research Integrity at IOPP, explores the growing pressures on peer review and more.

📖 Read more: https://ow.ly/PKAo50ZN9qP

#PeerReviewWeek2026 #PeerReview

Is anyone else seeing academic manuscripts of empirical studies putting the sections of the paper in a different order, rather than the traditional intro, lit review, methods, results, discussion, conclusion?

Did I miss a memo where this is flexible now? Is this an LLM thing?

#PeerReview […]

It's time for #peerreviewweek again, and this year's theme is on the very pertinent issue of 'Peer Review Capacity: Volume, Speed, and Quality'. You can find more details at peerreviewweek.net/theme.php

#peerreview #publishing #academicjournals

This year’s #PeerReview week, 14th to 18th Sept 2026, has the theme
Peer Review Capacity: Volume, Speed, and Quality
Find out more at
peerreviewweek.net
@physoc.bsky.social
@apspublications.bsky.social
@wileylifesci.bsky.social

🎯 A few days left to sign up for #SGIM27 peer review. Flexible, remote review window Sept 18 to 29. Sign up by Sept 15 for a shot at $100 off 2027 registration.

#SGIM27 #PeerReview #GIM

🎥 The Longevity & Aging Series brings Aging #researchers together to talk about their #longevity and #aging papers.

Watch the latest #episodes ⬇️
https://www.aging-us.com/longevity

#longevityandaging #openaccess #peerreview #interviews #videos #authors

A manuscript can read beautifully and still have problems with methods, evidence, or interpretation.

Polish helps with readability, but it should not influence how strongly the research itself is judged.

Save this for your next review.

#PeerReview #PeerReviewTips

What Is #PeerReview Worth? Rethinking the Economics of Academic Reviewing -
Peer review is fundamental to #scholarlypublishing. But the system relies overwhelmingly on researchers giving their time and expertise for free – often while publishers struggle to find reviewers & authors wait weeks or […]

#Peerreview is global, but #reviewersupport is often designed as if everyone starts from the same place.

Our latest blog looks at why training, mentoring, tools, and recognition need to flex around different experience levels and working contexts.

Read: buff.ly/ZYemRk9

#ReviewerRecognition

🎉 We're delighted that IOPP's AI-powered Duplicate Review Checker was awarded Highly Commended at the 2026 ALPSP Awards for Innovation in Publishing.

Congratulations to ImageTwin on winning this year's award, with research integrity taking centre stage.👏

#ALPSP2026 #ResearchIntegrity #PeerReview

Modern #ScientificPublishing often incentivizes overstating results at the expense of ensuring rigor. @maxkrummel.bsky.social &co test #DiscoveryStack, which seeks to realign #PeerReview with its core purpose by separating the assessment of quality & impact @plosbiology.org 🧪 buff.ly/1GRnb4b

#ReviewerTip: A manuscript can read beautifully and still have problems with methods, evidence, or interpretation.

Polish helps with readability, but it should not influence how strongly the research itself is judged.

#PeerReview #PeerReviewTips #CriticalReview

A moment of great pride from my days working in the Publications Division at the American Chemical Society was being part of the editorial team that launched Journal of Proteome Research.

#sciencewriting #sciencepublishing #scicomms #proteomics #peerreview #publishing

4/4
Finally, look at the synthesis.

Does the conclusion reflect both methods fairly, or does one end up doing most of the interpretive work?

What do you find hardest about reviewing mixed-methods research?

#AcademicChatter #PeerReview