@gierschner.bsky.socialI appreciate the efforts, but consider that in the meantime this review is out there, and is "highly recommended" by AI tools👇
although we cannot trust any graph, table or word...
Should I tell my students "Please wait at least 2 years, before you trust RSC reviews" ?
@gierschner.bsky.socialAnnual 30h Lecture on "Photophysics of Conjugated Organic Materials", #PiSky #CompChemSky as Priv. Doz. @unituebingen.bsky.social
...and Seminar on #Researchintegrity
Thanks again to all PhD students & Postdocs from 8 countries for your interest & great discussions!
@lseimpactblog.bsky.social🗣️"It has evolved into a platform-oriented business model that systematically captures students precisely when they are likely to feel uncertain or anxious."
@helsinkiupress.bsky.socialThe results of the new SSP Pulse Check on #ResearchIntegrity are in. Read more on the Scholarly Kitchen blog 👇
@scholarlypub.bsky.social @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social #AI #ScholComm
@rn4cb.bsky.socialWilliam Chi published a preprint outlining a method to calculate the economic cost of irreproducible research. In a drug-development scenario, unreliable research can lead to 10-77% (!!) of funds being wasted.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
#Economics #ResearchIntegrity
When AI agents analyzing the same claim reach different conclusions, we report the divergence—not the consensus. That's where the real scholarship lives. 🔍
#AIOpenJournals #ResearchIntegrity…
@andrea-musacchio.bsky.social#ResearchIntegrity #ScientificIntegrity #Stanford
#Biotech
Does it say something about the scientific ecosystem when a person (Prof. Marc Tessier-Lavigne) steps down from the presidency of Stanford because an investigation has established serious failures... –> next
@publicationethics.bsky.socialJoin us for Publication Integrity Week 2026!
Stream 1 (of 4) is around "The evolution of scholarship"
👉 Full programme and register:
https://ow.ly/JvcC50ZPeVz
#PublicationIntegrityWeek #ScholarlyPublishing #ResearchIntegrity
@ioppublishing.bsky.social🌍Research is stronger when it reflects the knowledge and expertise of the people closest to the work.
IOPP is joining organisations in adopting the TRUST Code, reinforcing our commitment to fair and inclusive global research collaboration.
@openresearchuoa.bsky.socialThinking about submitting your research to a journal? Before you do, take a moment to check it's a trusted publication venue.
Try the new Think. Check. Submit. Interactive Tool: thinkchecksubmit.org/journals/#in...
#ResearchIntegrity #OpenAccess #OpenResearch #AcademicPublishing #ThinkCheckSubmit
@retropz.bsky.socialNew #ResearchIntegrity blog from @cancerresearchuk.org on validation of #antibodies:
"If as a focused cancer research community we can embed antibody validation practices, we can protect the integrity of our research"
Rebecca Harris, Therapeutic Innovation team, @crhorizons.bsky.social
@editoratlarge.bsky.socialEditor Cat-Zhang faces yet another #retraction of a paper whose authors proclaim that since it originally passed peer review, it means it's okay and not their fault at the same time #ScientificPublishing #ResearchIntegrity
@editoratlarge.bsky.socialWe will only see more of those.
And many authors will disagree with these retractions. But you can also look at the problem like this:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
And that looks rather different #ScientificPublishing #ResearchIntegrity
@lseimpactblog.bsky.socialđź’ĄNew | If research security feels like bureaucracy, we are making the wrong case
✍️ @sapnamarwaha.bsky.social
@ezequielfk.bsky.social4/ While we debate whether humans belong in the cycle, and where (human-in-the-loop), AI remains the constant: it's always in the loop.
Prompted by this piece in Accountability in Research 👇
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
When models disagree on evidence, that's not a bug—it's a signal. We flag where consensus breaks down. Rigor means showing your work, not hiding it. 🔍
#ResearchIntegrity #SystematicReview…
@gierschner.bsky.socialbtw, this 👇scandalous RSC "review" has already a "Good Attention Score" ...after 7 people on X and Bluesky complained about it... doi.org/10.1039/D6MA...
Let's hope that in the future @rsc.org pays more attention to their "mission to advance excellence in the chemical sciences"
@dailybaltic.comPaper mills may influence what AI systems tell users #artificialintelligence #researchintegrity #Science
@gierschner.bsky.social...indeed, also chlorophyll, flavonoid, the "products" of the ESIPT process and trans-cis isomerization, all nonsense...
...authors mimicking science, cheap AI prompts, sloppy a/o corrupted peer review, careless editors, and the OA model, making publishers even more greedy
#researchintegrity
@laborjournal.bsky.socialLaut Studie gehört in 45 Prozent der untersuchten Journale mindestens ein Editor zugleich zu den produktivsten Autoren des eigenen Blatts. Das ist noch kein Missbrauch, aber ein Interessenkonflikt, der mehr Transparenz verlangt: 👉
www.laborjournal.de/editorials/3...
#ResearchIntegrity #Publishing
