#ReviewerTip: If an image raises a concern, focus on what can be observed.

Describe the pattern, duplication, inconsistency, or missing information, explain why it matters, and avoid speculating about intent. Investigation belongs with the editor.

#PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity #PublicationEthics

#ReviewerTip: Before questioning authorship, start with the evidence available.

Check contribution statements, disclosures, approvals, and inconsistencies. If information is missing, describe exactly what is unclear rather than speculating about intent.

#PeerReview #PublicationEthics #AcademicSky

#ReviewerTip: A manuscript can read beautifully and still have problems with methods, evidence, or interpretation.

Polish helps with readability, but it should not influence how strongly the research itself is judged.

#PeerReview #PeerReviewTips #CriticalReview

#ReviewerTip: Compare the abstract and conclusion with the results.

If the language becomes more certain than the evidence allows, point out exactly where the interpretation goes too far.

Save this for your next review.

#PeerReview #PeerReviewTips #AcademicSky #Edusky #PeerReviewers