If that psychological profile is accurate, how do you think it influences his approach to summary reversals? For instance, would a red-leaning jurist with that mindset be more inclined to push for a summary reversal if they believed a blue-state circuit was setting a dangerous precedent?

Quick question: Have you ever seen SCOTUS use summary reversal to police a blue-state circuit committing outright fraud? Since the unwritten 6-vote custom requires a supermajority to reverse summarily, what are the odds the conservative bloc agrees to stop it?

To your point on unprecedented territory: Have you ever seen SCOTUS use summary reversal to police a blue-state circuit committing outright fraud? Since the unwritten 6-vote custom requires a supermajority to reverse summarily, what are the odds the conservative bloc agrees to stop it?

No argument on the brutal history of colonialism and debt extraction (like the 1860s Mexican intervention). But that underscores the point: flattening complex global economics and centuries of labor evolution into a romanticized "guillotine catchphrase" ignores how systems actually work.

⚠️ To the claim "They don't let you have unions," France's most disruptive modern protests—like the Yellow Vests—are completely grassroots. They deliberately bypass traditional trade unions because workers felt left behind by the establishment. French real labor history is more complex. Not a meme.

The French Revolution actually led to laws that banned trade unions and strikes (Le Chapelier Law of 1791). France’s modern strike culture was built on late-19th-century union organizing, not the guillotine. French workers had to fight for the legal right to strike nearly a century later in 1864.

And "[i]n August 2019, Ackman wrote to MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito to discourage him from mentioning Oxman when discussing convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who had donated $125,000 to Oxman's lab." (See citation #143 in Ackman's Wikipedia biography.)

"'In the aftermath, I was deeply disappointed by the lack of support I received from the student community,' the plaintiff told The Sun." The survivor we stand with has faced the same isolation, while we've been completely ostracized. Shockingly, our search for legal help continues to yield naught.

Spot on. International students truly are the lifeblood of Higher Ed worldwide. And the systemic exploitation they face—exorbitant rents, wage theft, IP theft, etc. by weaponizing their immigration status—remains a massive issue that mainstream media across the political spectrum completely ignores.

1. A Court of Appeals erased a timely, unfinished brief, issued a secret panel default judgment on an unripe consolidated civil case, and failed to notify the appellant.