@ksvesq.bsky.social’s husband; father of daughters; prof. @georgetownlaw.bsky.social; #SCOTUS nerd @CNN.com
Bio: www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck
"One First" SCOTUS newsletter: stevevladeck.com

@stevevladeck.bsky.social
@ksvesq.bsky.social’s husband; father of daughters; prof. @georgetownlaw.bsky.social; #SCOTUS nerd @CNN.com
Bio: www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/stephen-i-vladeck
"One First" SCOTUS newsletter: stevevladeck.com
“The fact that we as a society have moved away from public executions would have mattered a lot for that earlier doctrinal understanding. That it wouldn’t mean nearly so much today is, in my view, a pretty telling indictment of #SCOTUS’s entirely recent jurisprudential shift.” Me on Nidal Hasan:
When I wrote Killing Stays in 2024, I think a public execution was beyond my imaginings (though what happened to Christa Pike was, sadly, not). @stevevladeck.bsky.social's latest One First on this captures a lot of what I'm thinking as I watch our grotesque killing state: tinyurl.com/5kd42xh4
“The fact that we as a society have moved away from public executions would have mattered a lot for that earlier doctrinal understanding. That it wouldn’t mean nearly so much today is, in my view, a pretty telling indictment of #SCOTUS’s entirely recent jurisprudential shift.” Me on Nidal Hasan:
Auditions for a Supreme Court seat continue apace
It takes six votes to agree to summary adjudication, but it can be 5-4 as to the result thereafter.
As I’ve explained before, the mere presence of unresolved legal questions is just *not* an obstacle to this Court vacating a lower-court stay of execution:
I don’t know about a first petition, but here’s a 5-4 majority in July 2020 vacating federal prisoners’ stays of execution even though, as the dissent explained, there were unanswered questions on the merits:
#SCOTUS has done this twice already this year.
Nope. The case you’re citing is pre-AEDPA.
Some time ago (but still *way* too recently), I had trouble at the airport with a TSA staffer who didn't recognize "Washington, D.C." as a valid issuer of driver's licenses.
One of my favorite trivia questions is to name the three countries that have two-letter state-like USPS abbreviations.
Now *that* I would've screenshotted and celebrated, as opposed to this b.s.
LOL. One could have some real fun with this...
Then they'll mail the check to Washington, WA. I think "Washington, N/A 200xx" has a higher chance of making it to me.
In the year of our lord 2026, a pull-down list for "state" as part of a vendor registration form provided by an Ivy League university does not offer the District of Columbia as a possible choice. C'mon people.
In Giraud (the Alina Habba case), she also promised that she would file a dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc "at a later date":
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
That was ... 8.5 months ago.
No, because he'll need a stay of execution long before the underlying lawsuit can be fully adjudicated. And even if lower courts grant one, #SCOTUS can always vacate it.
Hence the “if.”
Here's something I wrote for @politico.com back in 2019, right after the really important ruling in which a 5-4 Court turned its back on more than six decades of Eighth Amendment jurisprudence:
Right after Justice Kennedy retired, #SCOTUS materially shifted its Eighth Amendment jurisprudence, moving away from a test tied to "evolving standards of decency," and toward a static assessment of what was cruel and unusual in 1791.
That shift will matter a *lot* if there's a challenge in Hasan.