@rcalo.bsky.social
I am a law professor and information scientist at the University of Washington. I have a new book about law and technology that I hope you read. 💙
@rcalo.bsky.socialIt’s so embarrassing
@marklemley.bsky.socialReposted by @rcalo.bsky.socialTo be fair, ANY form of intelligence is an enemy to Trump 
@stanfordcis.bsky.socialReposted by @rcalo.bsky.socialWhen AI agents go rogue, who's liable?
@hartzog.bsky.social warns of "massive liability on both the criminal and civil side." @rcalo.bsky.social flags the gap: negligence and intent are hard to prove with unpredictable AI, leaving "victims without perpetrators."
@rcalo.bsky.socialI Quit OpenAI because its Culture is Broken. By David Robinson who co-founded Upturn www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
@christinaayiotis.bsky.socialReposted by @rcalo.bsky.socialThoughtful, stimulating conversation @teachprivacy.bsky.social "Teaching #AI Law" @gwlaw Alicia Solow-Niederman @ColoLaw @MargotKaminski @UWSchoolofLaw @rcalo.bsky.social @wmlawschool.bsky.social Margaret Hu @gwlaw.bsky.social @daniel-solove.bsky.social #LawOfTheHorse #AILaw #Robotics #ExistingLaw
@drzimmermann.bsky.socialReposted by @rcalo.bsky.socialWow, reading these words about #DemocratizingAI from @rcalo.bsky.social (@uwlaw.bsky.social) means the world to me—I keep learning a huge amount from the law&tech community & esp Ryan’s absolutely pathbreaking work. I am so inspired by #techlaw scholarship &want #philosophers to be in dialogue w/it!
@hankgreely.bsky.socialReposted by @rcalo.bsky.socialNo magic bullets, but it would be a promising start.
@rcalo.bsky.socialI don’t even care what your tech policy question is, the answer is restore the Office of Technology Assessment 🔥
@rcalo.bsky.socialHarvard professor invents robot law www.newyorker.com/magazine/202... 🙃
@rcalo.bsky.social
@acm-ethics.bsky.socialReposted by @rcalo.bsky.socialpapers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... by @rcalo.bsky.social and Veronica Paternolli
@katestarbird.bsky.socialReposted by @rcalo.bsky.socialHere's a post from our 2024 operations documenting an earlier version of this framework. We added the "no evidence" category during post-hoc analysis, because so many 2024 rumors were broad, un-evidenced claims about the 2020 election being "rigged". www.cip.uw.edu/2024/09/09/2...
@rcalo.bsky.social
@rcalo.bsky.socialAI Leaders Are Standing On a Liability Landmine. Today's @wsj.com cites Veronica Paternolli and my paper on liability for agentic AI. www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-l...
@rcalo.bsky.social“Our AI is scary too” is the saddest PR play
@rcalo.bsky.social🎯
@rcalo.bsky.socialWish I could 🫤
@rcalo.bsky.socialBanning "superintelligent" 🤢 AI plays right into industry rhetoric and keeps the focus off immediate, real world harms such as privacy, bias, and labor. Literally the same name of the silly Bostrom book everyone was reading 12 years ago.
@rcalo.bsky.socialMy computer and information science colleagues and I on supposed existential risks of AI. www.washington.edu/news/2026/09...
@rcalo.bsky.socialYou don’t say
