@ninajankowicz.com
🙅🏻♀️ Author (2 books & The Wayfinder newsletter), disinformation expert, advocate for targets of online abuse. ☀️ CEO, @americansunlight.org 😆 Tucker Carlson once called me a “highly self confident young woman” and meant it as an insult
@ninajankowicz.comRUSSIA TARGETED A BUS FULL OF CIVILIANS AND MULTIPLE APARTMENT COMPLEXES THIS WEEK ALONE. Maybe the ingrate is the guy who made the decision to fund that terrorism by purchasing oil in a last ditch attempt to boost his poll numbers?
@nicholasgrossman.bsky.socialReposted by @ninajankowicz.comI doubt Russia has tons of diesel to export. They're in a fuel shortage crisis. It'd be illegal, violating sanctions. And awful strategy while Russia is attacking Ukraine, menacing NATO allies, and helping Iran target Americans. But looks like Trump trying to jawbone markets before the midterms.
@benmshultz.netReposted by @ninajankowicz.comIncredibly honored to be included as a "censor" in Michael Shellenberger's latest fan-fiction release!
What great company to be in, next to my censurous colleages.
Never been happier to read 14 pages of bland, moderately-edited Claude-generated text in my life...
@ninajankowicz.comBiased but I think this is a particularly good issue of Last Week in Censorship
@ninajankowicz.comI'm sure you'll have some cosmic rationale
But here you are in the ninth
Two men out and three men on
Nowhere to look but inside
Where we all* respond to
Pressure
*not all :)
@benmshultz.netReposted by @ninajankowicz.comScreenshot 1: Panel description on 4 June 2026. Screenshot 2: Panel description yesterday, after GAC dropped out. Cosmetic edits, yes. Re-framing? Absolutely not. The "sentence in question" about the US acting, in specific cases, as a FIMI actor, remains substantively identical to the June draft.
@benmshultz.netReposted by @ninajankowicz.comGlobal Affairs Canada (GAC) claims it dropped out of #Disinfo2026 "following changes to the framing of several panel discussions." GAC was scheduled to chair my panel today on disinformation in the Arctic.
But, our panel description hasn't changed since June...! Receipts in the next post below.
@ninajankowicz.comding ding ding
@ninajankowicz.comThe craziest thing about this whole scandal is that the Trump administration appears to be most aggrieved about panels in which AMERICAN participants were sharing the view from here. It’s just so blatant.
@eliothiggins.bsky.socialReposted by @ninajankowicz.comSo it was the US State Department all along! Maybe Shellenberger should be emailing them about censorship instead of conference participants. #disinfo26 www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
@ninajankowicz.com“What this amounts to is a purported defender of free speech at the state department using the enormous power of the US government to try to pressure Americans from criticizing their government.”
@michael-feinberg.bsky.socialReposted by @ninajankowicz.comThis is an important and necessary reminder, and I completely second the recommendation to read Havel's essay. (I'd also add in Milosz's "The Captive Mind.")
@ninajankowicz.comSharing for no particular reason 🙃
@frenchresponsex.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gyReposted by @ninajankowicz.comEnable free press ❌
Harass civil society ✅ https://t.co/F3BusL213j https://t.co/2TyXI2wkNL
Source : https://x.com/FrenchResponse/status/2107509182748598627
@ninajankowicz.comShellenberger is seemingly preparing to smear a bunch of people attending a conference on disinformation this week. Ten bucks says he’s gonna claim the researchers there are cEnSoRiNg yOu!!!1 In reality they’re presenting their ideas. Talking. Debating. You know, using their speech rights.
@ninajankowicz.comReposted by @ninajankowicz.comMy thoughts about the UK's new National Centre for Information Defence. I think it can survive the 'censorship' backlash; UK discourse isn't as infected by conspiratorial brain rot (yet). But it's incumbent on the Burnham gov to fill the info void.
@ninajankowicz.comBurnham was fairly explicit in his speech and that didn’t stop them
@ninajankowicz.comMy thoughts about the UK's new National Centre for Information Defence. I think it can survive the 'censorship' backlash; UK discourse isn't as infected by conspiratorial brain rot (yet). But it's incumbent on the Burnham gov to fill the info void.
@ninajankowicz.comWasn't that kind of them? (Of course, civil litigants have no private right of action for treason. Durrrrr.) As in Murthy, the court found the plaintiffs had no evidence for their claims: "allegations from Plaintiffs simply assume causation through conclusory statements."
@ninajankowicz.comA group of charlatans who tried to bring literal treason charges against me and other former USG officials got their dreams dashed on the rocks of the Murthy standard. The suit sought to get me barred from public service, but stopped short of the death penalty 🙃
www.courtlistener.com/docket/71264...
