More on the pros and pitfalls in my latest @labourlist.bsky.social column here:
BUT consultation notably rows back on past Labour pledges to end, or move towards, ending our two-tier system of 'workers' (employees have more rights than so-called 'limb (b) workers'). It says creating a single status of worker is a 'longer-term goal' the government will only 'consider'. 6
Whether the new FWA, just finding feet as merger of several bodies, would have enough capacity to handle high-profile legal action - possibly vs some global firms' top lawyers - is a big open Q. When I asked its chair recently, he flagged it partly assesses status already in e.g. NMW cases. 5
Interestingly, it also floats some new ideas - the government itself via its new Fair Work Agency taking organisations to tribunal on workers' behalf, which would be a radical step. Plus it floats an online tool to help people work out their employment status, which sounds eminently sensible. 4
It includes 2 pre-briefed measures. First, it moves onus from individuals to organisations to prove they're 'workers' not self-employed. Second, it tries to tackle a loophole that means workers in all but name - with according rights - don't get them if they can technically send a substitute. 3
Here's the full consultation. It finally progresses reforms recommended in the Taylor Review almost a decade ago in response to high-profile controversies. So it's a landmark moment.
2
NEW: A consultation's out on cracking down on 'bogus self-employment', aimed at tackling the exploitation of gig economy workers, and it includes one surprisingly radical measure. But it's missing the progress simplifying, clarifying and strengthening workers' rights Labour promised in '24. 🧵
Good piece on bogus self-employment from @tombelger.bsky.social
Great to see the government moving forward and in line with our recommendations:
Brilliant piece by @tombelger.bsky.social on the need for the government to properly tackle employment status reform at the same time as developing an offer for the genuinely self-employed, who Labour often overlook, citing @jrf-uk.bsky.social work on insecurity in the labour market.
For more on the problem and what can be done, read some great recent policy papers that shaped my thinking at least by @jrf-uk.bsky.social, @thefabians.bsky.social, Rebecca Seeley Harris, @brightblueuk.bsky.social and @citizensadvice.bsky.social.
A good primer:
fabians.org.uk/publication/...
As @patrickmaguire.bsky.social notes - the sole trader still “confuses Labour’s intuitive sense of class'.
'Payslip Labour' still dominates Labour thinking too much, when over 4.5 million people are self-employed.
And yes, a declaration of interest as a freelancer myself...
It's no wonder polling show Labour ranks last on who is most supportive of the self-employed (Reform's first). Or that the public say Labour cares for civil servants and doctors than construction workers, Uber drivers and influencers.
Also - Labour called itself the 'party of the self-employed' and promised to champion the genuinely self-employed in 2024, too. That matters, given widespread low pay and security. But has anyone heard senior ministers even mention the self-employed since, let alone set out a proper offer?
Labour had promised...just that in '24 (screenshot). Just like the Tories promised action too in '18. It’s now nearly a decade since the Taylor Review urged government to stand up for gig economy workers. Why are we letting down our most precarious workers - especially in the party of labour?
Because employment law's too complex and unclear.
Ambiguity enables exploitation. Look at this @jrf-uk.bsky.social chart!
@labouruk.bsky.social has great new reforms to stop exploitation via ‘bogus self-employment’.
But oddly - there's no plan to clarify, simplify, strengthen employment status.
Why did 10,000 (!) current and former Bolt drivers have to go to court to prove they're workers?
Full story here - feedback and ideas for follow-ups very welcome. But in brief....🧵
labourlist.org/2026/10/tom-...
New: Bolt has just told its drivers they’re workers, not self-employed - legally entitled to minimum wage, holiday pay, protection against discrimination and pension auto-enrolment.
But why didn't they tell them that years ago when they started?
Thread on my new @labourlist.bsky.social column 🤨 🧵
But the story isn’t just about values.
We also heard how economic insecurity - particularly housing - is shaping politics in Bristol.
Our new report looks at what this means for Labour’s future in Britain’s cities.
thinklabour.co.uk/thinking/pai...
For our new report, Painting the City Red, we went to Bristol to ask voters what they thought about Labour and their values. One answer came through clearly: Labour’s values no longer feel clear enough.
Voters think council tax is unfair and most worry about how they will pay it, survey reveals
