Ashutosh Ghildiyal

@ashutoshg.bsky.social

Chef at The Scholarly Kitchen | Scholarly Publishing | VP, Growth and Strategy at Integra

@aaronhelton.comReposted by @ashutoshg.bsky.social

This is a pretty good rundown of why LLMs aren't necessarily connected to truth. Something plausible and internally consistent or coherent can be false, and simply thinking about it more doesn't lead one to truth, which requires empirical testing and verification (i.e., science).

@scholarlypub.bsky.socialReposted by @ashutoshg.bsky.social

Ask the Chefs: What Would You Have Done Differently About Open Access/Open Science if You Predicted the World as it Exists Today? Part 2 - The Scholarly Kitchen

@peerreviewcongress.bsky.socialReposted by @ashutoshg.bsky.social

#PeerReview should evaluate not if a paper is the final word but what it establishes, what is uncertain, & whether its reasoning & evidence are sound, transparent, & defensible enough to support further examination
@ashutoshg.bsky.social
@scholarlykitchen.bsky.social
@peerreviewweek.bsky.social