very glad to see this, with @claroche.bsky.social, out at @gsqjournal.bsky.social. academic.oup.com/isagsq/artic...
@lefteleven.bsky.socialReposted by @claroche.bsky.social
Christopher David LaRoche
@claroche.bsky.social
Stanton fellow at Carnegie Endowment. Assistant professor at Central European University and visiting at Bard College NYC. Plato to NATO.
@lefteleven.bsky.socialReposted by @claroche.bsky.social
@foreignaffairs.comReposted by @claroche.bsky.socialThere are real parallels between the development of nuclear technology and the buildout of AI systems, but the atomic age “cannot provide a ready-made blueprint for the problem that AI poses,” write @claroche.bsky.social and @nktpnd.bsky.social.
@claroche.bsky.socialLooks great.
@carnegienpp.bsky.socialReposted by @claroche.bsky.socialInterested in controlling existential risks from AI? Check out Chris LaRoche and @nktpnd.bsky.social 's new piece in @foreignaffairs.com www.foreignaffairs.com/united-state...
@lawfaremedia.orgReposted by @claroche.bsky.socialRecent state-level laws establishing reporting regimes have expanded the reach of government regulators over the AI industry, but the lack of a clear investigatory regime remains a glaring omission and limits the effectiveness of these laws, writes @claroche.bsky.social.
lawfaremedia.orgThe Forensic Gap in AI Safety LawsState AI laws require developers to report safety incidents—but not what investigation follows or what evidence they must keep.
@nktpnd.bsky.socialReposted by @claroche.bsky.socialNew in @foreignaffairs.com with @claroche.bsky.social: even if efforts to control the bomb may be a source of inspiration, they are not a ready-made template for AI governance.
On the limits of the AI-nuclear weapons analogy.
Gift link: www.foreignaffairs.com/guest-pass/r...