} すごく悲しい
[dj/events/art]
[ brain not working properly]
[R-18 content @d1rty-r4m.bsky.social ]

@megumimusic.net
} すごく悲しい
[dj/events/art]
[ brain not working properly]
[R-18 content @d1rty-r4m.bsky.social ]
CODA. will be holding open decks event. Let us know if you want to DJ. start 25th OCT - 09.00pm JST. ................................................................ CODA.では、オープンデッキイベントを開催します。 DJを希望される方はお知らせください。 10月25日 21.00 JST から開始。 ✲✲✲
I'll take her to my home
//
>found a cute cat
[ @alliecatvt.bsky.social ]
// >I'll be DJing today >JP times ⁂
but I am sure, if you take someone using AI for something they look to achieve with interest or passion, and instead ask to teach them; they would most likely want to learn if offered than just get non rewarding all made results. Just what i think the study is missing ~
Asking internet, an AI or looking for an answer in a book is one thing rather than thinking youself. And talking of general topics without direct interest for the subject will obviously end on these results. Humans are lazy by nature; especially if there is no interest for them into the topic.
I think this study do not take in account the actual bad cases of AI usage. Let’s say you like graphic design; Sure learning is harder than asking an AI, but the study doesn’t talk at all about the actual satisfaction someone get from improving and learning something new.
We sort of already had similar thing as an answer giving tool before AI, that replaced encyclopedias and books I used back then as a kid, just internet. That said, I think the AI study experiment should focus more on what people are actually into, like a skill or something they really want to know.
何かできるはずなんだけど~ ^_−☆
// >it’s been a long time [10_13 21.00 JST]
finally met @notnonoe.bsky.social
thank you for the opportunity @megumimusic.net !
ofc ofc! i always have him around in case i need … you know ¬‿¬
Let's talk about AI in VRChat.
Be sure to fill out the Google form at the bottom of the article.
i gotchu ╹◡╹
i love it when my work get turned into real things! i wish i had one of these stickers ~ nice job you two ! *´꒳`*
let’s say i have my own experience of running an NSFW event for quite some time and here is what i would recommend: Run the events Group only, Age verified instances, add a pre-lobby to your venue with a clear disclaimer text and user action to confirm joining and have active moderation ofc ~ *^ω^*
welcome ~  ̄▽ ̄
happy birthday ~ ^_−☆
Moving to another platform is just pushing things to sooner or later but it will become standard and default on every social/web platform around the world very soon anyway. The key is how it is done ig but i dont think any solution will anyway satisfy everyone.
I don’t think the matter here completely depends of the platforms we are using, so in the end that you use service A,B, C or D; the various acts around age verification and related subjects does not depend on this platforms; such as the DSA for EU for example. They just have to comply anyway.