I don't want to use it at all 🤷🏽‍♂️

This is one reason why you shouldn’t upload work into LLMs during the peer review and grading processes. That work is confidential, and you have no right to share it without permission. You are taking someone’s intellectual property and giving it to the entire world without their consent.

I'd even say there's no such thing as the "non-political," but yes. Also this part: "Second, the critical tradition and the associated contextual approaches to the nonpolitical offer important inspiration for improving operationalization in empirically oriented political communication research."

Same thing with “the ways in which” -> “how”

Also, there’s value in people being able to write. And not just in 80-minute blocks in a blue book, but being able to communicate in written form some information that they have to think about and pore over and convey in longer form. Seems we’re giving up on that with in-person oral/written exams.

The combat correspondents and combat camera Marines who worked for me would have plenty of candid pics of Marines and sailors, too. We just usually wouldn’t publish them. Again, no way to know either way, and frankly this is a silly thing to go back and forth about.

Combat correspondents/photographers/videographers document training exercises as well. The location of the photos has nothing to do with who took them.

For sure, we don’t know. But not at all unreasonable that he was a military-trained photographer rather than just some guy with a camera screwing around.

If he was a combat correspondent or photographer, he would have received training as such. Today, Defense Information School provides extensive training, plus you’re always perfecting on the job. I worked with some incredibly talented photographers when I was in.

All of this. I also want to add that, in my research, I found that a lot of “inconsistencies” in a victim’s story actually came from gender bias affecting investigators’ record keeping and interview methods.

One of the foremost scholars of polarization in the world is telling us that polarization is the wrong concept to apply to the contemporary United States...so maybe don't do that

“The current level of political animosity is exactly what one would expect to see if an extremist faction attempted to rescind the hard-earned rights of the vast majority of the country’s citizens… and its pathology is not anger—it is the movement to undermine a generation of rights.”

My new JOD piece arguing against the “cure polarization” approach to saving democracy.