Artificer of Code.
OpenSource, TC39 Signals, StarbeamJS & @emberjs.com enthusiast and advocate
Former @react.dev
Where i'm at
nullvoxpopuli.com/page/links
Projects
tutorial.glimdown.com
limber.glimdown.com
#SwarmLyfe
Queen of Blades, she/her, obv

@nullvoxpopuli.com
Artificer of Code.
OpenSource, TC39 Signals, StarbeamJS & @emberjs.com enthusiast and advocate
Former @react.dev
Where i'm at
nullvoxpopuli.com/page/links
Projects
tutorial.glimdown.com
limber.glimdown.com
#SwarmLyfe
Queen of Blades, she/her, obv
Likely in far less code, too
giiitittttuuuuuubbbb
this kind of detailed analysis of something like an error page is _invaluable_
thank you @hugorcd.com! 🙏
btw, `my-bad` is an open, shareable project - it is designed to be useable by anyone, not just @nuxt.com!
Unfortunately the i/o issue isn't heat related
Yup.
Use a vm or native linux or something -Also gives you a feeling of safety with full auto and separation of personal files
nice! I have not done phone-dev / "app store" dev
only ones with no auth and no payment
A point i have with open sourcing frontends, is that: - ai can reverse engineer files found in the browser And: - with the right license, you can sue anyone who tries to make money from copying the code (I'm not saying everyone should use a permissive license... Use GPL3 or stricter)
Mobile apps communicate with a server to check if they've been paid for
people pay for the storage, collaboration, etc. lots and lots of things are not actually frontend. and no one is hosting a figma clone without figuring out the backend
which products are frontend-only? but also, payment "infra" can happen without backend. I suppose folks would pay for "support" in a frontend-only project. but logging in is slightly hard in a frontend-only project. so....
what people actually pay for is the backend, infra, and reliability.
yes
yes
If you use a "pentest" tool and tell a company that their *frontend* has a security vulnerability because sourcemaps are present, you are wasting everyone's time.
Your company's frontend should be open source
does it have scroll-container based flipping based on occlusion of the reference element?
👀 Introduce pulls.review
Categorize changes in Pull Requests into logical groups, with a summary. Helps you do reviews more efficiently by focusing on what matters.
Everything runs in your browser. With opt-in GitHub userscript, GitHub Actions, or CLI for local git changes!
dude! this is amazing <3 How long did this take? I wish GH actually cared about review experience. gonna use this muchly
why isn't this fixed yet? 'bot constantly forgets that estimations don't matter and aren't important