Grilled Cheese

ExploreLog inSign up
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyCommunity StandardsHelpGet the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-11 02:37:10 EDT

Explore

PostsPeople
LatestRanked
@sillymickel.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 7:49 PM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES* Ch 2, p. 10

🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

or, for free pdf copy: drive.google.com/file/d/17Mvg...

🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡 ☯️ #transpersonal 🪽 #primal ☮️ #experiential 🐉 #rebirth 🦋 #RainbowWarriors 🦋

I. BEING SHIVA — DESTROYING AND CREATING WORLDS Page 11 CHAPTER 2 Destroying Worlds: Our Reality Is Species Determined and the Relativity of Science ... Culturally Constituted Realities, Biologically Constituted Realities, and Biological Relativity We Cannot Unknow What We Know but We Can’t Know What We Can’t Know
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 30, 2026, 7:34 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p 22

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, for free pdf: drive.google.com/file/d/17Mvg...

25/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡 #metaphysics ☯️

I. BEING SHIVA — DESTROYING AND CREATING WORLDS Page 22 …do not exist or are not perceived or understood the same from other cultural perspectives — in other words, by people from other cultures. And there are biologically constituted realities: That is, there are those supposed “brute facts” that either do not exist or are not perceived or understood the same from other biological perspectives — in other words, by species, beings, or entities other than the human one. These last are as biologically relative as the first ones are culturally relative.
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 28, 2026, 9:52 PM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p. 21

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, read/dwl on blog: funnygod.wordpress.com/2019/11/15/t...

24/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness #FBR

This is biological relativity, and what it adds to our understanding when seen as analogous to the other relativities is that it tells us: a) Our realities can only be understood within the context of our species ... other species could not understand them ... and we cannot really understand the realities of other species ... lower or higher, if in fact there are such categories for species in Ultimate Reality. In some way, large or small, species will misunderstand each other. In fact, in that species are actually distinct from each other, whereas cultures are not ... see Note 6 of this chapter ... there is much more to biological relativity than there has ever been to cultural relativity. b) Many elements of our human reality will be invisible to or not even exist within the realities of other species — they are biologically constituted realities. Some things, maybe many or all things, which exist within the perceived and understood realities of other species will be invisible to us or not even exist within our possible world: They are species-specific, biologically constituted realities for them, as well. Bringing this all together, we now see that there are culturally constituted facts: That is to say, facts that are cultural creations and either… 2. DESTROYING WORLDS Page 21
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 28, 2026, 12:23 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p. 21

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, read/dwl on blog: sillymickel.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-...

23/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡

2. DESTROYING WORLDS Page 21 especially the Judeo-Christian ones, which assert humans to be superior in Nature and having dominion over all others in Nature. I call anthropocentrism or human superiority to Nature a flat earth assumption because it is equally as obviously true yet ultimately wrong, as well as relative to a perceiver, as is a notion the Earth is flat. Not to mention that seeing Reality outside that assumption of anthropocentrism and acknowledging this species relativity instead would be as momentous and world-changing as was the discovery of the heliocentric nature of our solar system. Incidentally, this assumption of species superiority — species centrism — is also a central component of the Unapproved and Hidden I describe in others of my works.7 To understand species relativity, we can use those same understandings, discussed above, in regard to time, space, and culture relativity. We will see that all of those understandings are true, as well, for the realities created or constituted by our specific physical constitution, our biology, separate as it is for each species. This is biological relativity, and what it adds to our understanding when seen as analogous to the other relativities is that it tells us: a) Our realities can only be understood within the context of our species ... other species could not understand them ... and we cannot really understand the realities of other species ...
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 25, 2026, 3:14 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p. 20

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, for audio version of the book: www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-...

22/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness

@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 24, 2026, 12:56 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p. 20

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, for ebook copy: www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-...

21/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡 #metaphysics ☯️

I. BEING SHIVA — DESTROYING AND CREATING WORLDS Page 20 Biological Relativity At any rate, getting back to culturally constituted facts and those nasty brute facts, again, I was saying there is nothing “brute” about what humans would call brute facts. Rather, they are biologically determined facts. They are facts relative to our species. These “facts” or truths are biologically relative. They are true, with surety, only in relation to our species. They might exist for other species as well, certainly they are shared by many, but a) they are not shared by all, and b) we must conclude they are not even facts the way we know them, for they are necessarily perceived differently by each and every species. That is to say, if they, indeed, even show up as elements or “facts” in their realities, their perceived realities. Yes, we have another relativity — species relativity — to include with the others we have been coming up with in the sciences. Einstein let us know that our space and time were relative, not absolute. Franz Boas and all anthropologists after him helped us to see that our cultural realities were relative, as well. That means that all that we conceive and create as cultural elements can only be understood within the context of the culture they exist within.
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 23, 2026, 1:58 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p. 19

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, for paperback: www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-...

20/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡 #metaphysics ☯️

Are we sure that the way we chop up Reality into parts — separate things, separate beings, and so on — so that we might name them and analyze them separate from our perception of them is anything but a product of our biological programming? Does all possible perceptors see the world in terms of parts? How can we say that is the case? Perhaps, indeed, that separation of ourselves from Reality and dissecting of it is just some neurosis or illness ... some delusion ... that is particularly human to do so. Or at least that it is unique to humans. But going off on that tack is jumping ahead. For this book will, indeed, take us there and past that point as well. In fact such considerations are specifically addressed in the chapter titled, “The Radical Rational View of Us And It,” Chapter 15. Hang on, and congratulations on your forethought, by the way. 2. DESTROYING WORLDS Page 19
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 22, 2026, 1:05 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by M Adzema

Ch 2, p. 19

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, for free pdf copy: drive.google.com/file/d/17Mvg...

19/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡 #metaphysics ☯️

2. DESTROYING WORLDS Page 19 …those stars, or suns — and infinite numbers of dimensions is still only the cosmos that we — we lowly, humble, and limited perceptually humans — are able to perceive. So how can it not be true that there even more possibilities for ways of perceiving Reality, more possibilities of realities, than even the infinite numbers of them we are able to deduce with our limited senses at this particular time with its limited knowledge as well!!?? And, yes, I realize that some of you readers are jumping ahead and even questioning the reality of entities, beings, perceptions, perceptors, perceivers, percepters, senses, and all else, which I have been leaning on in making my case, and would like to challenge me on that.5 For you will say that they — any being, beings, or entities — also are deduced from what we know from our limited apprehension of the world. So they, too, might be no more than human projections. Thinking this way, you might say that my theory is empty or insubstantial for it, also, is deduced from our perception of realities, which I am acknowledging to be unspecial and infinitely variable. You might say that even our perception of different and separate perceivers — what I am terming, perceptors — is questionable. How do we know any entities or beings exist, outside of our own one — oneself — if all that we perceive is determined by what we expect and project? Are there even numbers of things — as when D’Andrade asserted numbers were “brute” — let alone beings?
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 20, 2026, 10:55 PM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p. 18

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, read/dwl on blog: funnygod.wordpress.com/2019/11/15/t...

18/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #FBR #metaphysics ☯️

Yet how could physicists even define these invisible worlds as “other dimensions”? Think about it, are dimensions not also relative to our species, with some other species conceivably apprehending the Cosmos in a completely different way? Is it not possible there are species whose perceptions of Reality — equal to or more valid than ours — would in no way involve those dimensions ... perceptions where those dimensions do not exist, as they are overridden by or subsumed within some other perceptual array vastly different from ours? Or, accepting the reality of those dimensions, how can we say with any certainty at all that the brute facts we have in our dimension qualify as brute facts in those dimensions as well?! At any rate, I am going to leave to the side, for now, the complicating factor of the infinite number of beings and possibilities of existing and perceiving that would exist in each of those different dimensions. I will not even get into the fact that this incredible cosmos with these billions of galaxies — an estimated one hundred billion galaxies with an average of two hundred to four hundred billion stars per galaxy and god-only-knows how many planets coinciding with all… I. BEING SHIVA — DESTROYING AND CREATING WORLDS Page 18
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 20, 2026, 8:07 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p. 18

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, read/dwl on blog: sillymickel.blogspot.com/2020/02/the-...

17/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡

I. BEING SHIVA — DESTROYING AND CREATING WORLDS Page 18 Science’s reluctant qualification of indeterminacy is quite a bit different from an acknowledgment of what I am putting forth: Which is that there might be a more valid understanding, or perception, by some conceivable other being or species, in which those elements of the universe we consider to be absolute can be seen to be non-existent or radically wrong. And beyond that ... the most important part of this ... that in comparison to whom, our interpretations of things are not seen merely to be to be biased as a result of our species identity, but that the very existence of these supposedly absolute things of our world are found to be projections, in their entirety and thus completely insubstantial, of our human psyche ... to be mere projections of our uniquely human perspective on things ... creations purely concocted of the elements of our unique distinction from Nature. That is a distinction, which I will not elaborate upon now, but which has us as supremely flawed in relation to the rest of Nature. This is something I have demonstrated in several of my works, in particular, Planetmates (2014b) and Prodigal Human (2016a). Furthermore, consider that physicists talk about the possibility of other dimensions intersecting our world. So these alternate realities share the same time and space ... or they share whatever Ultimate Reality we exist in ... with us.
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 19, 2026, 2:36 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p. 17

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or for audio version of the book: www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-...

16/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡

Other than the few like these, the great majority of less stellar scientists will acknowledge that Reality is indeterminate — as they are prodded, by the new physics, to admit — yet they will assume validity for their established understandings, in the face of contrary evidence, if not in the current scheme, then in some other and future one. Which they further presume will be built upon their current assumptions, which at most, at that time, will be refined in parts. So scientists assume the cosmos they peer into, measure, and study is the same one all other species apprehend. This is regardless the vast differences in the way that universe is perceived by the beings we know about or, for that matter, the scope of any particular species’ perception of it, which we know at least sometimes is far far more far- ranging, advanced, than ours. Despite these facts to the contrary, nowhere in science is it advanced that their interpretations of the cosmos are relative to humans only. Much more about that, upcoming. 2. DESTROYING WORLDS Page 17
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 18, 2026, 2:35 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES: Matter, Divinity, & the Path of Ecstasy* (2016) by Michael Adzema

Ch 2, p. 17

🧵Click this panel for Thread, complete book

or, for kindle/ebook copy: www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-...

15/ 🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡 #resist

2. DESTROYING WORLDS Page 17 However, remember that experiment with the particle and wave, where what we look for ends up being what we see. Ponder that and its implications. Now, think again for a minute, and you will realize that when science uncovers discrepancies or anomalies, incongruent with their abiding theories, the most they will acknowledge is that their concepts of the elements of the Cosmos are open to reinterpretation and re- inclusion in some other, some grander scheme which, they assume, at some point will validate them in some way they do not see right now. Nowhere do scientists concede their galaxies, black holes, atoms, matter, space, Big Bang, et al, are realities relative only to humans, for all we know. Or, for that matter, that they might not be existing outside of human perception. When it comes to that tree in the forest, there is never any question about it making a sound for scientists. It just does. Indeed, these are the assumptions scientists all make; except, that is, for a few remarkable ones like Einstein, whose vast perspective on it all led him to conclude there is a spiritual reality for it all beyond and outside of what science can know. Or Roger Jones, the author of Physics as Metaphor (1982) who pulled the blinds to the side on the ultimately empty and insubstantial nature of the concepts assumed in science, specifically its most substantial one, physics.
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 17, 2026, 3:05 AM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES* Ch 2, p. 16

🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

or, for paperback: www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-...

🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡 #metaphysics ☯️ #transpersonal 🪽 #experiential 🐉 #rebirth 🦋 #RainbowWarriors 🦋 #FBR

Yet this is exactly the arrogance that prevails in all of our sciences. When we imagine other beings in our Universe, as we do in some of our arts, we anthropocentrically assume they would have human features, with only slight variations, with senses similar to ours and perceiving the exact same world, and that they would have evolved in some manner parallel to the way we did on Earth. That is forgivable in our arts and cinema, as in Star Trek and Star Wars, as they are not claiming to be science. But what is damning and is embedded within and constraining the purview of our sciences is this assumption that the Universe as we have come to know it through our science, with its space, time, stars, Big Bang, galaxies, dimensions, planets, and so on, is the Universe in some ultimate way outside of our humanly limited perception. What? You don’t think so? You think the cosmos we measure with our humanly-created technology and perceive with our human, our limited, senses, is pretty much like the one that exists outside our perception of it? That our perceived and arrived-at cosmos is the Cosmos? No doubt you think it has to be. You have never questioned it. I. BEING SHIVA — DESTROYING AND CREATING WORLDS Page 16
@sillymickel.bsky.socialSep 9, 2026, 4:20 PM

*THE SECRET LIFE OF STONES* Ch 2, p. 16

🧵Click panel below for Thread, complete book

or, for free pdf copy: drive.google.com/file/d/17Mvg...

🧵👇 💡📚💙 #SLOS ✨☯️💡🪽 #SLOSCH2 📖 #TruthWarriors ❕ #psychology ☮️ #consciousness 💡 #metaphysics ☯️ #transpersonal 🪽 #primal ☮️ #experiential 🐉 #RainbowWarriors 🦋

I. BEING SHIVA — DESTROYING AND CREATING WORLDS Page 16 …totally unimaginable interpretations! As I said, our senses scan and pick out of an infinity of possibilities of what can be perceived. What it “notices” ... or “creates”? ... is relative to who we are as a species. Even the determination of that falling tree being an event is relative, hence questionable, ultimately. Relatedly, whether or not there is actually even a physical world in which it occurs is suspect and is something we will deal with at length and in due time in this book. The Bias Invisible in Science Regardless, the point of all this is that removing our anthropocentric blinders in this way we must conclude that the world, as experienced, is created of realities that are not only culturally constituted, as anthropologists point out. There are also biologically constituted realities. The “brute facts” to which D’Andrade refers are — nothing brute about them — biologically determined facts. How anthropocentrically arrogant for us to think that our brute facts are brute in some conceivable Ultimate Reality that all existing or conceivable living beings or entities share, meaning are able to perceive ... indeed are able to perceive ... pretty much the way we do!