Plant Scientists: Think about the last peer review invitation you declined. What would have helped you say yes: more time, a better expertise match, clearer expectations, or institutional recognition?
@aspbofficial.bsky.social
@aspbofficial.bsky.socialPlant Scientists: Think about the last peer review invitation you declined. What would have helped you say yes: more time, a better expertise match, clearer expectations, or institutional recognition?
@acadmedjournal.bsky.social🎉To celebrate #PeerReviewWeek, we encourage you to try this peer-review exercise. 🎉 Practice reviewing a Research Report submitted to Academic Medicine and compare your work to that of the actual reviewers: https://bit.ly/4hkFrw2. #PRW2026 #PeerReview #ScholarlyPublishing
@ametsoc.orgWhat makes a good peer review? More than finding what’s wrong✍️
For #PeerReviewWeek, AMS Editor’s Award recipients share lessons on providing rigorous, constructive feedback—and how reviewing makes the science stronger.
Read more on AMS Headlines: https://bit.ly/4iZS5So
@srcdorg.bsky.socialHappy Peer Review Week! SRCD extends our sincere thanks to the reviewers who generously share their time and expertise. Your thoughtful feedback strengthens our journals and advances the science of child development.
@mariomalicki.bsky.socialEASE Peer Review Committee is happy to share for #PeerReviewWeek its new toolkit - 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐏𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰: 𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐟𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐑𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐒𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐄𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐞 ease.org.uk/communities/...
@aspetjournals.bsky.socialHas the process of peer review fundamentally changed in scientific publishing? We asked John Tesmer, PhD, and Editor-in-Chief of Molecular Pharmacology, for his thoughts.
Learn more about Molecular Pharmacology: https://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/
@universitypress.cambridge.orgHelp shape the research of tomorrow as a peer reviewer.
💡 Understand more about the editorial process
📄 Keep up to date with new research in your field
🤝 Share your expertise to support fellow researchers
Find out more 🔗 https://cup.org/3SRcnmn
@asapbio.bsky.socialIf you wish to join this amazing team, fill out the application form buff.ly/eI0JpxS
#PeerReviewWeek
@emily-elliott.bsky.socialVetting the solution: Did this study or plan undergo peer review? No, it did not, but peer review is important. Before my frustrating adventure to pick up lunch near the Capitol, we published a piece that I wrote for #FeedingTheElephant in honor of #PeerReviewWeek. Check it out.
@councilscienceed.bsky.social💻 CSE Connect 🌍️ Keeping Reviewers Engaged: Strategies for a Sustainable Future
🚨 Join us TOMORROW!
In celebration of Peer Review Week, this Connect is free for non-CSE members. 🎉
📅 September 17, 2026 | 3:00 pm- 4:00pm ET
✨ Register: cse.memberclicks.net/ReviewConnect
@eileenclancy.bsky.socialLifecycle Journal is a publish-before-review, journal-agnostic evaluation model that couldn't exist without our evaluation and peer review partners. So this #PeerReviewWeek I want to give a huge THANK YOU for all of their hard work and for supporting Lifecycle Journal! #PRW2026
@genetics-gsa.bsky.socialFor #PRW2026, GSA Vice President David Greenstein shared his insights on what makes a helpful review, a valuable piece of peer-review advice, and an impactful paper he’s encountered throughout his career. #PeerReviewWeek
1/5 🧵⬇️
@insight.jci.orgThis year’s theme for #PeerReviewWeek is Peer Review Capacity:
Volume, Speed, and Quality. In today's changing publishing landscape, we
commend our reviewers for meeting the demands, maintaining the highest
standards, and staying true to the peer review process. Thank you
Reviewers!
#PRW #PRW2026
@jci.orgThis year’s theme for #PeerReviewWeek is Peer Review Capacity:
Volume, Speed, and Quality. In today's changing publishing landscape, we
commend our reviewers for meeting the demands, maintaining the highest
standards, and staying true to the peer review process. Thank you
Reviewers!
#PRW #PRW2026
@pennpress.bsky.socialHappy #PeerReviewWeek! Let's celebrate the valuable work of peer review, an often unrecognized task that ensures that the work we publish is accurate, reliable, and merits becoming part of the durable scholarly record. Thank you, peer reviewers!
@jmirpub.bsky.socialAI is changing research. But what does that mean for peer review?
Our Scientific Editorial Director, Tiffany I. Leung takes a closer look at why AI disclosure still matters:
blog.jmir.org/why-ai-discl...
#PeerReviewWeek #AIinResearch #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity #JMIR #PRW2026
@channel-view.bsky.socialNew blog post: Peer Review Week 2026
In this post our Editorial Director Anna Roderick explains why, despite its challenges, peer review is so important to us, and offers some top tips for reviewers.
@aufdroeseler.bsky.socialOh boy. I owe academia about 45 reviews. I am sorry. Please invite me as a reviewer!
Apart from writing a review during #PeerReviewWeek I cleaned up my own tracker and you can read most of my reviews since 2024 online on a page on my Uni's gitlab: lroesele.zivgitlabpages.uni-muenster.de/reviews/
@ioppublishing.bsky.social🔍 How can peer review strengthen validation? #TheDifferenceIMakeAsAReviewer
For Dr Abrar Bhat of Stanford University, peer review is about helping authors clearly demonstrate how their research builds on and advances existing knowledge. 🤝
@prelights.bsky.socialReading recommendation for #PeerReviewWeek
@ethanewe.bsky.social highlights a study that looks at 115,000+ PLOS papers to explore who chooses open peer review and whether openness relates to article quality. #preprint Adrian Barnett & Matt Spick
#preLight⬇️
prelights.biologists.com/highlights/w...