The 56-year-old Mexican man who died Saturday while in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody was a lawful permanent resident in the country, the agency said in a statement. ICE added he was detained because officers believed he obtained his legal status in the U.S. fraudulently.

No, in both Rider Tools and Metro Pulse when you search for an address it shows you blue dots for the nearby bus stops. It does not show you all the nearby bus lines (like, lines that show where the bus goes). You can only see bus lines by searching for a bus line or clicking on a specific bus stop.

This has in common w other moral panics that it's terrifying to contemplate your kids stopping speaking to you for no reason. Rather like thinking about your kids being abused by a Satanic cult at daycare! So people click on the articles & so outlets produce more articles.

Looking forward to the Chief Justice of the United States once again saying and doing absolutely nothing about the President once again going after an individual federal judge for applying the law when the President deliberately breaks it.

Ossoff: "It's the most corrupt administration of all time & everybody knows it. While the crook president & his crook family rake in billions from all over the world, you pay more for everything... they lied us into war & spent most of the last year covering up for the world's most famous pedophile"

California’s billionaires have a combined net worth of $2.4 trillion. Under Prop 40, their net worth would fall to…just under $2.3 trillion. What amounts to a rounding error for them would allow millions of their fellow Californians to afford healthcare. Vote yes on Prop 40.

"The US conservative movement is engaged in a nationwide effort to reverse child-labor laws and reinstitute child labor" sounds like a crazy leftie conspiracy theory, but ... yeah. It's real.

will try to answer these in a piece next week but for now i will say that part of the *point* of court expansion, in my mind, is to create a disequilibrium — a potential race to the bottom — that will force a truce.

4. Why aren't the reforms you prefer--threatening or actually changing the Court's budget, docket, calendar, etc.--subject to the same objections that they would result in a partisan tit-for-tat cycle and harm public confidence in the Court?

3. Do you really think the strategy of making the Court "look over its shoulder" by threatening its budget, etc. would work with THIS right-wing supermajority? Wouldn't many of them rather die (rhetorically speaking) than change their approach to judging?

2. Do you think that the Supreme Court is not currently a partisan actor? If so, why? If not, why should the public have confidence that that is the case?

Many have responded to these Qs already. Here are some others: 1. Do you think Rs will refrain from changing the size of the Court if necessary to preserve their power if Ds don't open the door? Why, given they already shrank SCOTUS to 8 in 2016-17 and have expanded high courts in UT, AZ, & GA?

The charges Trump's DOJ brought against me are baseless and dangerous—not just to me, but to anyone who dares to speak out against this admin’s lies. I’m in Congress to serve my district and home. I will not be intimidated out of doing the work my constituents trusted me to do.

🧵2 Federal law prohibits federal officials from ordering, bringing, or keeping troops at election sites, except to repel armed enemies of the United States. 18 U.S.C. § 592 carries up to five years in prison. Contact your MoCs & state attorneys general. Demand safeguards against voter intimidation