Grilled Cheese

ExploreLog inSign up

Lori Ringhand

@loriringhand.bsky.social

357 Following252 Followers

Law professor. Knows things about the Constitution and elections. Author of “We the Voters: The Constitutional Choices that Shape America’s Elections.”

PostsRepliesMedia
@loriringhand.bsky.socialOct 15, 2026, 5:28 PM

Despite what the justices seem to want us to believe, the court operates inside the constitutional checks and balances system, not outside it.

@loriringhand.bsky.socialOct 15, 2026, 5:26 PM

No no no! We do not need an “evenly divided” crt. We need a court more tethered to the electoral preferences of the American people over time. 18 year terms allow every president to have two appointments with a Senate election in between. That’s the way you tether it.

@loriringhand.bsky.socialOct 15, 2026, 4:17 PM

No ideology is entitled to equal rep on SCOTUS. The problem is appointments have become severed from electoral accountability. Add a seat for every justice who served more than 18 yrs, use confirm hearings to develop a norm of 18 yr retirements, & then start moving those who don’t to senior status.

@dahlialithwick.bsky.socialOct 13, 2026, 9:37 AMReposted by @loriringhand.bsky.social

With the brilliant Prof Julie Suk on all the ways judicial supremacy violates international norms and a couple of ways to fix it that don't require heavy constitutional lifting

@loriringhand.bsky.socialOct 13, 2026, 9:56 AM

If you want to support the development of third-parties, advocate for multimember districts, and ranked choice voting.

@justinlevitt.bsky.socialOct 9, 2026, 7:27 PMReposted by @loriringhand.bsky.social

This is a big deal. DC fed judge says that DOJ's pursuit (and use) of the state voter files is unlawful, on a bunch of different grounds. And effectively confirms that for the 18 states that submitted files willingly, whoever collected the files at DOJ Civil Rights committed federal crimes.

@loriringhand.bsky.socialOct 2, 2026, 1:06 PM

Congress absolutely can make rules about voting in federal elections. This is about voter qualifications, which is different. There can be a grey zone between the two, but congressional power to make time place and manner rules re federal elections is clear, in the Constitution, and broad.

@loriringhand.bsky.socialSep 30, 2026, 3:44 PM

Hey, Wisconsin! Interested in learning more about our elections, and how we might change them? Please join us Monday night (Oct 5) at the Menard Center for Constitutional Studies. Free and open to the public!

@onthemedia.bsky.socialSep 26, 2026, 6:15 PMReposted by @loriringhand.bsky.social

An obscure case from 1977 has found new relevance since Trump’s latest press ban. @sonjawest.bsky.social explains how it could shape the legal fight between Politico, CNN, MS Now and Trump.
lnk.to/onthemedia/b...

@cmewing.bsky.socialSep 22, 2026, 5:15 PMReposted by @loriringhand.bsky.social

Writing is fun. You endure hours of excruciating pain and self-doubt. But in the end, you’ve created something. And then you get to hate that thing.

@katestarbird.bsky.socialSep 22, 2026, 10:24 PMReposted by @loriringhand.bsky.social

Rumors about “rigged elections" are now a fixture of U.S. elections, leading to diminished trust in election results & democracy (broadly). These rumors can sometimes be hard to debunk, esp. in their early stages. Our UW team has identified the 6 common ways that election integrity rumors mislead:

Infographic titled "Six Ways 'Rigged Election' Rumors Mislead." A two-column table pairs six labeled categories with descriptions. The first three categories are:

No Evidence: The rumor is entirely unsubstantiated. There's no evidence to support the rumor.

Fake/False Evidence: The rumor is based on fake or synthetic evidence (e.g. AI-generated content), manipulated evidence, or false witness testimony.

Misinterpreted Evidence: This rumor is based upon real evidence that has been misinterpreted or intentionally mischaracterized to create a false impression.

A black banner then introduces the final three categories: "Real Evidence, Real Voting Issue, False Narrative."

Exaggerated Impact: The rumor centers on a real issue with voting but falsely insinuates or exaggerates impact on election results.

Ignored Remedies: The rumor centers on a real issue with voting but ignores and/or obscures the remedies that would address this problem

False Blame: The rumor centers on a real issue with voting but either falsely attributes intent for an accidental issue or places blame on an innocent party.

Source: UW Center for an Informed Public, September 2026.
@loriringhand.bsky.socialSep 19, 2026, 1:29 PM

Stunning!

@loriringhand.bsky.socialSep 14, 2026, 12:58 PM

Good lord. This was what, the 80s ?!?!

@joshuaadouglas.bsky.socialSep 7, 2026, 2:29 PMReposted by @loriringhand.bsky.social

My new piece for @washingtonmonthly.bsky.social on the media’s responsibility on election law cases: washingtonmonthly.com/2026/09/07/m...

@loriringhand.bsky.socialAug 11, 2026, 12:33 PM

I loved this book! Rarely has this history been so relevant. And there is still time to pre-order before its August 13 release! In Congress We Trust?: Enforcing Voting Rights from the Founding to the Jim Crow Era (Cambridge Studies on Civil Rights and Civil Liberties) a.co/d/0hW9Cmdw 

PCan’t Stop Twinkling 💕💚@proftolson.bsky.socialAug 10, 2026, 5:12 PM

Grateful to @loriringhand.bsky.social (a brilliant scholar who I have learned from for my entire career) for a generous and thoughtful review of the book. Check it out here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

papers.ssrn.comAlter, or Abolish? (Book Review)On the 250th Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Americans are mired in fundamental questions about how our democracy should work, and who gets to d
a.coAmazon.com
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyCommunity StandardsHelpGet the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-17 03:54:26 EDT