Grilled Cheese

ExploreLog inSign up

Data for Progress

@dataforprogress.org

14 Following14.7k Followers

Equipping the progressive movement with the data and insights it needs to win.

dataforprogress.org

PostsRepliesMedia
@dataforprogress.orgOct 8, 2026, 7:19 PM

Read the full poll: s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/www.filesfor...

And check out the coverage in @bloomberg.com: news.bgov.com/bloomberg-go...

@dataforprogress.orgOct 8, 2026, 7:19 PM

In all three states, we find strong support for policies that mitigate the potential job losses from AI — including guaranteed jobs and health care.

Crosstab chart of polling data from Data for Progress. Title: Voters in Key States Support Various Policies to Mitigate Job Loss Due to AI. Question: Do you support or oppose these policies Congress could adopt to mitigate potential job losses from AI? Support (IA / MI / OH): Guaranteed jobs program for workers laid off due to AI or automation: 79% / 75% / 80%. Guaranteed health care for workers who lost jobs due to AI or automation: 73% / 71% / 76%. Tax incentives to hire humans, with penalties for replacing workers with AI or automation: 72% / 73% / 76%. Ban on developing artificial “super” intelligence that could replace massive amounts of jobs: 70% / 71% / 73%. Dividend giving Americans a share of profits from AI companies that use commercial data: 70% / 68% / 74%. Universal basic income (monthly check to every American) funded by raising taxes on AI companies: 61% / 62% / 66%. September 4–14, 2026 survey of 3,157 likely voters in IA, MI, and OH.
@dataforprogress.orgOct 8, 2026, 7:19 PM

About 3 in 4 voters in Iowa, Michigan, and Ohio think AI will increase billionaires’ wealth. But only about 1 in 5 think it will do the same for American workers.

Bar chart of polling data from Data For Progress.
Title: Voters in Key States Believe AI Will Increase the Wealth of Billionaires, But Not American Workers.
Description: How much do you agree or disagree with each of the following? — AI will increase the wealth of...
Billionaires — Agree: 79%, Disagree: 8%
American workers — Agree: 21%, Disagree: 64%
Billionaires — Agree: 76%, Disagree: 10%
American workers — Agree: 21%, Disagree: 62%
Billionaires — Agree: 75%, Disagree: 10%
American workers — Agree: 23%, Disagree: 61%

September 4–14, 2026 survey of 3,157 likely voters in IA, MI, and OH.
@dataforprogress.orgOct 8, 2026, 7:19 PM

NEW POLL with Guardrails Action: Voters in Iowa, Michigan, and Ohio say they are less likely to vote for a candidate who takes money from AI companies. On net, that penalty is larger than the penalty for voting to cut billions from Medicaid.

Crosstab chart of polling data from Data For Progress.
Title: Voters in Key States Are Less Likely to Vote for a Candidate Who Takes AI Super PAC Money.
Description: Below are actions that a potential candidate for office might take. For each, please say if the action would make you more or less likely to vote for that candidate.
A candidate who receives funding for their campaign from Super PACs funded by AI companies or their executives — IA: 74%, MI: 73%, OH: 73%
A candidate who voted to cut billions in funding to Medicaid — IA: 71%, MI: 71%, OH: 73%
A candidate who supports a nationwide abortion ban, without exceptions for rape, incest, or the life of the mother — IA: 64%, MI: 66%, OH: 66%
A candidate who supports key parts of Trump's agenda, including helping Trump enrich himself off corrupt crypto schemes while in office — IA: 64%, MI: 66%, OH: 65%

September 4–14, 2026 survey of 3,157 likely voters in IA, MI, and OH.
@dataforprogress.orgOct 8, 2026, 1:58 PM

Read the full poll with @refugeesinternational.org and @refugeeadvocacylab.bsky.social:

www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2026/10...

@dataforprogress.orgOct 8, 2026, 1:58 PM

Voters overwhelmingly agree (76%) on a path to citizenship for immigrants who are authorized to work in the United States for over five years, have been paying taxes, have passed security checks, and who have no criminal record.

Bar chart of polling data from Data for Progress. Title: Voters Overwhelmingly Believe Immigrants Should Be Allowed to Access a Path Toward Citizenship Under Certain Conditions. Question: If an immigrant has been authorized to work and live in the U.S. for over 5 years, has paid taxes, has passed U.S. government security background checks, and has no criminal record, should they be allowed to access a path to permanent status and then citizenship? Results (should be allowed / don't know / should not be allowed): All likely voters: 76% / 7% / 18%. Democrats: 85% / 6% / 9%. Independents/third party: 75% / 7% / 18%. Republicans: 65% / 8% / 27%. Know a refugee: 83% / 1% / 16%. Don't know a refugee: 76% / 6% / 18%. September 18–20, 2026 survey of 1,194 U.S. likely voters.
@dataforprogress.orgOct 8, 2026, 1:58 PM

Voters also oppose current U.S. immigration enforcement policies: - 61% oppose ICE arresting immigrants at schools, churches, and hospitals - 68% agree the U.S. should not deport asylum seekers without hearings - 60% oppose third-country deportations

Bar chart of polling data from Data For Progress.
Title: A Majority of Likely Voters Oppose Deporting Immigrants to Countries Other Than Their Country of Origin.
Description: Currently, the U.S. government is deporting thousands of immigrants – including people legally granted protection in the United States – to countries other than their country of origin, including countries they have never been to. For instance, the U.S. has deported an immigrant from Cuba to South Sudan and an Afghan asylum seeker to the Central African Republic. Do you support or oppose this practice?
All likely voters — Support: 31%, Oppose: 60%
Democrat — Support: 16%, Oppose: 76%
Independent / Third party — Support: 30%, Oppose: 62%
Republican — Support: 48%, Oppose: 41%
Yes, I know someone who is a refugee — Support: 35%, Oppose: 62%
No, I do not know someone who is a refugee — Support: 32%, Oppose: 60%

September 18–20, 2026 survey of 1,194 U.S. likely voters.
@dataforprogress.orgOct 8, 2026, 1:58 PM

NEW POLL with @refugeesinternational.org and @refugeeadvocacylab.bsky.social:

Voters across party lines strongly support the U.S. having a refugee program, including 78% of Democrats, 66% of Independents, and 55% of Republicans.

Support rises to 90% among voters who know a refugee.

Bar chart of polling data from Data for Progress. Title: More Than Two-Thirds of Voters Believe the U.S. Should Have a Refugee Program. Question: A refugee is a person forced to leave their country to escape war, violence, or persecution due to factors such as race, religion, or political opinion. Should the government have a refugee program that helps bring some people seeking refuge to safety in the U.S.? Results (should have / don't know / should not have): All likely voters: 67% / 10% / 23%. Democrats: 78% / 7% / 15%. Independents/third party: 66% / 10% / 24%. Republicans: 55% / 13% / 32%. Know a refugee: 90% / 1% / 9%. Don't know a refugee: 66% / 10% / 25%. September 18–20, 2026 survey of 1,194 U.S. likely voters.
@refugeeadvocacylab.bsky.socialOct 8, 2026, 1:11 PMReposted by @dataforprogress.org

📈NEW POLL: The Lab, @refugeesinternational.org & @dataforprogress.org find that voters across party lines strongly support the US refugee program, oppose current immigration enforcement policies, & overwhelmingly support a path to citizenship for immigrants
www.refugeeadvocacylab.org/resources/tw...

Image reads, “New poll. Two-thirds of voters back the U.S. refugee program, majorities oppose current U.S. immigration enforcement policies.” Image also includes, from left to right, the Refugee Advocacy Lab, Refugees International, and Data for Progress logos across the bottom of the image. The background of the image is a photo of a rally in support of refugee resettlement.
@dataforprogress.orgOct 7, 2026, 1:58 PM

A majority of voters (56%) want the government to invest more in public housing, including a majority of Democrats and Independents.

www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2026/10...

Bar chart of polling data from Data For Progress.
Title: Most Voters Want the Government to Invest More in Public Housing.
Description: Do you think the government should invest more, less, or the same amount in public housing?
All likely voters — The government should invest more: 56%, The government should invest the same amount: 28%, The government should invest less: 10%, Don't know: 6%
Democrat — The government should invest more: 70%, The government should invest the same amount: 21%, The government should invest less: 5%, Don't know: 4%
Independent / Third party — The government should invest more: 54%, The government should invest the same amount: 25%, The government should invest less: 12%, Don't know: 8%
Republican — The government should invest more: 43%, The government should invest the same amount: 37%, The government should invest less: 15%, Don't know: 6%

August 21–24, 2026 survey of 1,175 U.S. likely voters.
@dataforprogress.orgOct 7, 2026, 1:58 PM

NEW: We find strong support for the Green New Deal for Public Housing, which would upgrade the U.S. public housing stock to be zero-carbon and energy-efficient.

www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2026/10...

Bar chart of polling data from Data For Progress.
Title: A Strong Majority of Voters Support the Green New Deal for Public Housing.
Description: Some lawmakers have proposed a Green New Deal for Public Housing, which would upgrade all of U.S. public housing stock to be zero-carbon and energy-efficient. To do this, the bill would create a series of grant programs to fund:Energy-efficiency upgrades to increase energy savings in all 860,000 public housing units in the U.S.Workforce development that creates good-paying job opportunities for public housing residentsSolar energy for public housing communitiesImprovements to weatherize public housing to better withstand extreme weather Do you support or oppose the Green New Deal for Public Housing?
All likely voters — Support: 72%, Oppose: 20%
Democrat — Support: 83%, Oppose: 10%
Independent / Third party — Support: 71%, Oppose: 24%
Republican — Support: 61%, Oppose: 28%

August 21–24, 2026 survey of 1,175 U.S. likely voters.
@dkthomp.bsky.socialSep 29, 2026, 1:05 PMReposted by @dataforprogress.org

www.derekthompson.org/p/the-death-...

@dataforprogress.orgSep 29, 2026, 3:49 PM

Read the full poll here: www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2026/9/...

@dataforprogress.orgSep 29, 2026, 3:49 PM

In 1995, 88% of Americans said that they had entertained others in their home in the past year. In 2026, just 67% of Americans have done so — a 21-point decline. Church attendance has dropped by 20 points, and picnics and club meetings have dropped by 19 points.

Chart from Data for Progress showing changes in Americans' social activity from 1995 to 2026. The chart compares data from 1995 from the DDB Needham Life Style Surveys and a 2026 survey from Data for Progress. The polling finds that the percentage of Americans saying they have "entertained people in my home" in the past year has declined from 88% to 67% from 1995 to 2026.
@dataforprogress.orgSep 29, 2026, 3:49 PM

Our new polling finds that Americans have significantly reduced their participation in social activities over the last 30 years. There have been double-digit declines in Americans entertaining people in their homes, going to club meetings, and doing volunteer work since 1995.

Chart from Data for Progress showing changes in Americans' social activity from 1995 to 2026. The chart compares data from 1995 from the DDB Needham Life Style Surveys and a 2026 survey from Data for Progress. The polling finds major declines in Americans' participation in social activities. For example, the percentage of Americans saying they have "entertained people in my home" in the past year has declined from 88% to 67% from 1995 to 2026.
@dataforprogress.orgSep 23, 2026, 6:50 PM

Unfavorable attitudes toward Flock cameras carry across party lines. After reading a brief description of Flock cameras, voters, including Republicans, have a negative view of the technology. Those views hold even after reading arguments supporting and opposing the cameras.

Bar chart of polling data from Data For Progress.
Title: Negative Views of Flock Cameras Hold After Exposure to Support and Opposition Arguments.
Description: Supporters of Flock cameras argue that these cameras have been effective at tracking the movement of criminals across jurisdictions, which has improved public safety and solved thousands of crimes, including car thefts and kidnappings. Opponents of Flock cameras argue that these cameras are a severe invasion of privacy and cite dozens of cases in which police officers have used the data to track the movement of innocent Americans, such as their current or former girlfriends. Knowing what you know now, do you have a mostly positive or mostly negative view of Flock cameras?
All likely voters — Positive: 33%, Negative: 60%
Democrat — Positive: 23%, Negative: 68%
Independent / Third party — Positive: 28%, Negative: 64%
Republican — Positive: 46%, Negative: 48%

September 18–20, 2026 survey of 1,194 U.S. likely voters.
@dataforprogress.orgSep 23, 2026, 6:50 PM

NEW: A majority of voters now hold an unfavorable view of Flock cameras.

In August, 41% of voters viewed the technology unfavorably. One month later, 52% are now unfavorable, for a -29-point margin.

www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2026/9/...

Time series chart of polling data from Data For Progress.
Title: Unfavorable Views Toward Flock Have Increased Since August.
Description: Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the following people or institutions?— Flock Safety surveillance cameras

Favorable — Increased, with the highest response reported on Sep 14, 2026 (26%) and the lowest response recorded on Aug 21, 2026 (22%).
Unfavorable — Increased, with the highest response reported on Sep 20, 2026 (53%) and the lowest response recorded on Aug 21, 2026 (41%).
3 surveys of 3,583 U.S. likely voters, conducted August 21–September 20, 2026.
@dataforprogress.orgSep 23, 2026, 2:54 PM

“Swing voters are not asking Democrats to split the difference on every issue. They want Democrats to advance tangible solutions to lower the cost of living and take on the powerful interests they believe are responsible for making their lives harder.”

thehill.com/opinion/camp...

@dataforprogress.orgSep 23, 2026, 2:54 PM

Our polling finds that among self-identified moderates, a majority say billionaires are a sign of a dysfunctional economy. And while a majority of 2026 swing voters identify as moderate, they’re more interested in raising taxes on the wealthy than conservative cultural stances.

Bar chart of polling data from Data For Progress.
Title: Swing Voters Say Raising Taxes on the Wealthy Would Move Their Vote to Democrats.
Description: Which of these policies would make you definitely vote for a Democratic candidate in an upcoming election? Please select up to three options.
Raise taxes on the wealthy — 28%
Create a Medicare for All health care system — 24%
Ban artificial intelligence from setting prices or wages based on personal data — 21%
Restrict private utility companies from passing unreasonable costs on to customers — 20%
Raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour — 19%
Stop providing military aid and weapons to Israel — 17%
Increase border security — 17%
​​Nothing would make me definitely vote for a Democratic candidate — 16%
Invest in building new affordable housing — 13%
Increase oil and gas drilling — 12%

May 15–June 21, 2026 surveys with 447 respondent interviews of U.S. swing voters.
@dataforprogress.orgSep 23, 2026, 2:54 PM

Just because voters identify as “moderate” does not mean they are clamoring for conventional centrism. Most want candidates who will challenge billionaires and the political establishment.

New op-ed from our Executive Director @rodonnell.bsky.social:

thehill.com/opinion/camp...

Older posts
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyCommunity StandardsHelpGet the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-11 02:37:10 EDT