Nukes, weird tech, and conflict at @404media.co Host of angryplanetpod.com
Tips: [email protected] // signal: 347 762-9212

@mjgault.bsky.social
Nukes, weird tech, and conflict at @404media.co Host of angryplanetpod.com
Tips: [email protected] // signal: 347 762-9212
I recently spoke to Scientific American’s Science Quickly podcast about the Hugging Face hack and how to read between the lines of the “rogue AI” frame to find human accountability m.youtube.com/watch?v=kUkf...
dragon's dogma 2
I really enjoyed doing this interview with Frances Haugen about how leaking to journalists works and why sources get caught, why Meta continues to he a disaster, and what it’s like to see yourself dramatized in a movie: youtu.be/oB3IxwCfP7M?...
Iowa city council debates proper time in meeting agenda to "undo the curse that was just put on our city."
I have noticed in various offline circles — particularly media and political science — it is still considered rather inappropriate to acknowledge that the US President is evidently quite insane. It's not that these people don't *know* it; they clearly do. You just aren't supposed to *say* it. 🙃
lost in a lot of the coverage of this is that there's been a ten year long fight in Iowa over religious freedom. The ACLU filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Satanic Temple earlier this year
spoke to a man who kicked off a city council meeting in Iowa with an invocation to Satan. “I think we're seeing you know a big shift in our politics. I think we've seen a rise of Christian nationalism in this country [...] and I find that highly troubling."
Iowa man kicks off controversy over religious freedom in the small town of Ottumwa by opening a city council meeting with a prayer to Satan, which then kicked off a debate about the proper time in the meeting agenda to undo the “curse
A man convicted of manslaughter in Arizona will be resentenced because an AI-generated video of his victim speaking from beyond the grave was ruled to have carried “undue emotional weight” as an impact statement.
this is really interesting. The sister's arguments comparing AI-generated video to how long it took to accept photographs in a courtroom in particular. It's obvious she's thought about this a lot. Everyone's line for what is 'acceptable' use of AI is different. Here's another example.
a key nuance is that she wrote the avatar's speech. the video itself was AI-generated. She plans to read the same words again during the next sentencing hearing
in Wales view, this is an artistic expression of her grief. No different than other impact statements that come in the form of a poem
spoke to Stacey Wales, the woman who made an AI-generated avatar of her brother to speak in court, for a long time this morning
they spent the first hour of this lengthy meeting discussing the official honoring of Charlie Kirk
behold, it's in this thread. time stamped
millions of Americans googled "why won't Angela Paxton say her husband's name" this weekend
“‘Many senior engineers believe it’s inevitable we’re going to have a massive data breach as a result of Hatch.’ Muse is called ‘Hatch’ internally and in Meta’s codebase.” @404media.co
the publisher is putting up yet ANOTHER wall in an attempt to fight against all that slop
this is doubly beautiful because HeadOn was homeopathic quack medicine that literally did nothing and never went through clinical trials. The sticks were 99 percent wax. It was all marketing and no product
my favorite thought experiment at the moment is the cognitive dissonance between "we will force our sentient unpaid ai agents to make millions of restaurant reservations for us. that will be their only purpose. they will live in a tamagotchi." But we also must make sure they are happy doing this