#Hwa1 #whatbecomespossible
6.
the shift called the third voice becomes possible and creates something neither could have produced alone

If they explain each other, you're just repeating yourself. Keeping them separate means they could actually go against each other, not fully agree, or even make sense together, which makes for a way more interesting final product #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

The verbal and visual tracks shouldn’t explain each other because they’re supposed to create something new, and that is the "unexpected" #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

Probably a lot of confusion and distortion. It'll be cool to see everything laid out without an explanation or context behind it. Just there and happy to be there. #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

#hwa1 #whatbecomespossible They shouldn't explain each other because we are going to put it together at the end and thats the beauty of it. The possibility is having a meshed masterpiece at the end.

The two tracks shouldn't explain each other because they don't actually connect until later. The unexpected result of the clash is part of the project. #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

The verbal and visual tracks shouldn't explain one another because if they do then the third voice may never come to fruition. #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

6. Our verbal and visual tracks should not explain each other because our third voice will act as a combination of both tracks. This will provide our audience with a new, unique idea. #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

the verbal and visual tracks shouldnt explain each other for most of the final project because it makes it harder for the third voice to appear #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

idk emmm I think they should stay like separated I feel like because they explain each other so much there is less room for ur own interpretation like kind of the third voice to come in #whatbecomespossible #hwa1

It makes sense that they would not really explain each other. I do not see them having the same meaning, but complementing each other to make a final explanation, perhaps. #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

Your verbal and visual tracks shouldnt explain each other for most of the project because it allows for them to not sync up which in itself can allow for interesting storytelling and add a third voice that wouldnt be there if they were synced. #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

6. Our verbal and visual tracks shouldn't explain each other, because our third voice will become a chaotic combination of both, aiming to provide our audience with a new idea that is neither similar nor completely different. #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

For the final project, it seems like we're creating a completely new third voice that is a mix of the verbal and visual tracks. I am intrested to see what it will turn out like.

#hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

For the final project, it seems like we're creating this third voice that overlaps verbal and visual tracks #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

The verbal and visual tracks shouldn't explain each other because it takes away the audience's opportunity to create their own meaning #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

#hwa1 #whatbecomespossible I think having the visual and verbal parts mean different things could make the final project more creative and interesting.

#hwa1 #whatbecomespossible
Our Verbal and Visual tracks shouldn't explain each other for the of your final project because both tracks have different meanings.

I would say that they shouldn't explain each other for the most part because they are two different tracks that require different ideas. On your final project your third voice becomes possible. #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible

Having the verbal and visual tracks "clash" until the final projects allows us to not only sit in that clash and analyze it, but also for a new, third voice to come out that wouldn't have been present within each track individually #hwa1 #whatbecomespossible