Delay in a contact case? §155b FamFG allows a Beschleunigungsrüge (expedition complaint). The court must decide on it within one month—not finish the whole case.
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/famfg/__155b.html
#FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

Shared residence is not a scoreboard. Under §1697a BGB, the child’s best interests guide the court. Safety, relationships and practical realities matter—not a preset percentage. #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

§9a SGB VIII: Ombuds offices offer independent advice in youth-welfare disputes. They are not appeal courts. Check legal remedies and deadlines separately. #Jugendamt #FamilyJustice

§163 FamFG requires suitable experts in custody and contact proceedings. Qualifications matter; methods and conclusions must also withstand scrutiny. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/famfg/__163.html #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

Who checks whether Jugendamt complaints lead to change? Independent advice matters. So do anonymised findings and corrective action. What belongs in an accountability report? #Jugendamt #FamilyJustice

A Hague return order is not a custody award. Article 19 of the 1980 Convention separates return proceedings from deciding custody on the merits. https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=24 #HagueConvention #FamilyJustice

§37(2) FamFG: A decision impairing a participant’s rights may rely only on facts and evidence they could comment on. A Jugendamt report is not exempt. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/famfg/__37.html #FamilyJustice #Jugendamt

Delay in a German child case? §155b FamFG allows parties to challenge delay in proceedings covered by §155(1). The court must decide that complaint within one month—not the custody dispute itself. #FamilyJustice #FamilyCourtReform

Shared residence: are we measuring nights, or how children actually fare? Safety, stable routines and the child’s views should guide the debate—not a percentage alone. #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

Contact proceedings: §155 FamFG says the court hearing should take place within one month of proceedings starting. This is not a deadline for the final ruling.
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/famfg/__155.html
#FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

§1666a BGB: separating a child from the family is permissible only if the danger cannot be addressed otherwise, including through public support. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/__1666a.html #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

Independent advice is not the same as independent oversight. Who checks whether Jugendamt complaints lead to corrected practice? #Jugendamt #FamilyJustice

§163 FamFG: custody/contact reports require a suitable expert. A teaching or social-pedagogy qualification needs recognised additional diagnostic and analytical training. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/famfg/__163.html #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

Akteneinsicht (file access): §13 FamFG lets parties inspect court files unless serious interests of a party or third person oppose it. Transparency has safeguards. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/famfg/__13.html #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

Shared residence is not a maths exercise. Assess safety, daily care and the child’s needs—not just equal nights. A timetable is a means, not the measure of welfare. #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

When a child refuses contact, which explanations were tested? Research should distinguish fear, conflict and undue influence—not replace assessment with a label. #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

§155b FamFG: a Beschleunigungsrüge (expedition objection) must be decided within one month. That is NOT a deadline to finish the whole child case. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/famfg/__155b.html #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

Comparing shared residence across Europe? Check age groups, time thresholds and survey methods before ranking countries. Different definitions can produce misleading comparisons. #FamilyJustice #ChildrensRights

A conflict with the Jugendamt? § 9a SGB VIII provides for independent ombuds offices to advise families and help resolve youth-welfare disputes. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/sgb_8/__9a.html #Jugendamt #FamilyJustice

Anayo v. Germany (20578/07): Article 8 required a child-specific assessment of the biological father’s contact request—not automatic contact. Procedure must examine welfare. #ECHR #FamilyJustice