Grilled Cheese

ExploreLog inSign up
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyCommunity StandardsHelpGet the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-10 01:38:52 EDT

Explore

PostsPeople
LatestRanked
@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 24, 2026, 9:19 AM

.@edps.europa.eu [email protected]

Cervera-Navas presents EDPS "AI regulatory sandbox pilot" at #UNGA81 — while his own office certified 3,000+ screenshots as Art. 17 EUDPR transparency (D(2025)1485).

#UNGA81 #AIGovernance #EUDPR

[Visual digest of EDPS letter D(2025)1485, signed by Secretary-General Leonardo Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025 in case 2025-0348 — the "screenshots are transparency" doctrine. Six verbatim panels from the letter: (1) The "I consider" first-person assertion at page 5, § 5.3 — Cervera-Navas himself signs that the format is "compliant", "intelligible", "easily accessible" and ensures "transparency". (2) Page 2: "Up to now, the EDPS has provided the data subject with more than 3 000 pages of logs on consultation operations." (3) Page 4: "the EDPS provided logs on consultation operations in PDF format. Accessing such format does not require the data subject to buy software." (4) § 5.2: the same letter cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022 to concede that the format "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". (5) Page 5: "the picture of the log file … show[s] that information has not been tampered with" — in 2026, the year of AI-manipulated evidence. (6) Page 6: the closing word "Regulation" — the document's signature block shows it was signed by Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025. Full letter PDF: https://www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply %20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf ]
@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 24, 2026, 9:19 AM

.@edps.europa.eu .@europol.europa.eu

Wiewiórowski lectures Europol on "expanded data processing on uninvolved individuals" — yet his own office certified 3,000+ screenshots as Art. 17 EUDPR transparency (D(2025)1485).

#EDEN2026 #EUDPR #Europol

[Visual digest of EDPS letter D(2025)1485, signed by Secretary-General Leonardo Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025 in case 2025-0348 — the "screenshots are transparency" doctrine. Six verbatim panels from the letter: (1) The "I consider" first-person assertion at page 5, § 5.3 — Cervera-Navas himself signs that the format is "compliant", "intelligible", "easily accessible" and ensures "transparency". (2) Page 2: "Up to now, the EDPS has provided the data subject with more than 3 000 pages of logs on consultation operations." (3) Page 4: "the EDPS provided logs on consultation operations in PDF format. Accessing such format does not require the data subject to buy software." (4) § 5.2: the same letter cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022 to concede that the format "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". (5) Page 5: "the picture of the log file … show[s] that information has not been tampered with" — in 2026, the year of AI-manipulated evidence. (6) Page 6: the closing word "Regulation" — the document's signature block shows it was signed by Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025. Full letter PDF: https://www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply %20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf ]
@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 24, 2026, 9:12 AM

A supervisor who screenshots instead of exporting logs is not fit to advise on that balance.

D(2025)1485: https://tinyurl.com/22jk9hqe

#CerveraNavasDoctrine #EUDPR #OLAF

[Visual digest of EDPS letter D(2025)1485, signed by Secretary-General Leonardo Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025 in case 2025-0348 — the "screenshots are transparency" doctrine. Six verbatim panels from the letter: (1) The "I consider" first-person assertion at page 5, § 5.3 — Cervera-Navas himself signs that the format is "compliant", "intelligible", "easily accessible" and ensures "transparency". (2) Page 2: "Up to now, the EDPS has provided the data subject with more than 3 000 pages of logs on consultation operations." (3) Page 4: "the EDPS provided logs on consultation operations in PDF format. Accessing such format does not require the data subject to buy software." (4) § 5.2: the same letter cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022 to concede that the format "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". (5) Page 5: "the picture of the log file … show[s] that information has not been tampered with" — in 2026, the year of AI-manipulated evidence. (6) Page 6: the closing word "Regulation" — the document's signature block shows it was signed by Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025. Full letter PDF: https://www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply %20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf ]
@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 24, 2026, 9:12 AM

.@europol.europa.eu .@edps.europa.eu [email protected] [email protected] .@felixbolanosg.bsky.social

CerveraNavasDoctrine:
1. Logs → screenshots.
2. Screenshots prove nothing.
3. OLAF case 22749.

D(2025)1485: https://tinyurl.com/22jk9hqe

#EDEN2026 #EUDPR #CerveraNavasDoctrine #OLAF

[Visual digest of EDPS letter D(2025)1485, signed by Secretary-General Leonardo Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025 in case 2025-0348 — the "screenshots are transparency" doctrine. Six verbatim panels from the letter: (1) The "I consider" first-person assertion at page 5, § 5.3 — Cervera-Navas himself signs that the format is "compliant", "intelligible", "easily accessible" and ensures "transparency". (2) Page 2: "Up to now, the EDPS has provided the data subject with more than 3 000 pages of logs on consultation operations." (3) Page 4: "the EDPS provided logs on consultation operations in PDF format. Accessing such format does not require the data subject to buy software." (4) § 5.2: the same letter cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022 to concede that the format "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". (5) Page 5: "the picture of the log file … show[s] that information has not been tampered with" — in 2026, the year of AI-manipulated evidence. (6) Page 6: the closing word "Regulation" — the document's signature block shows it was signed by Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025. Full letter PDF: https://www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply %20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf ]
@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 22, 2026, 7:45 AM

#Interoperability requires machine-readable, structured, parseable data.

What does #CerveraNavasDoctrine offer instead? Screenshots of logs — pixel grids, not data.

D(2025)1485 certifies screenshots as #EUDPR Art. 17 compliant. No structured data. No interoperability.

#UN #EDPS #AIGovernance

[Visual digest of EDPS letter D(2025)1485, signed by Secretary-General Leonardo Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025 in case 2025-0348 — the "screenshots are transparency" doctrine. Six verbatim panels from the letter: (1) The "I consider" first-person assertion at page 5, § 5.3 — Cervera-Navas himself signs that the format is "compliant", "intelligible", "easily accessible" and ensures "transparency". (2) Page 2: "Up to now, the EDPS has provided the data subject with more than 3 000 pages of logs on consultation operations." (3) Page 4: "the EDPS provided logs on consultation operations in PDF format. Accessing such format does not require the data subject to buy software." (4) § 5.2: the same letter cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022 to concede that the format "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". (5) Page 5: "the picture of the log file … show[s] that information has not been tampered with" — in 2026, the year of AI-manipulated evidence. (6) Page 6: the closing word "Regulation" — the document's signature block shows it was signed by Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025. Full letter PDF: https://www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply %20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf ]
@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 22, 2026, 7:45 AM

D(2025)1485:
www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply%20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf

OLAF case 22749:
www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/OpenLetterReportingThePicturesofLogsToTheOLAF_WithAnnexI-signed.pdf

#EUDPR #UN #EDPS #AIGovernance

[Visual digest of EDPS letter D(2025)1485, signed by Secretary-General Leonardo Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025 in case 2025-0348 — the "screenshots are transparency" doctrine. Six verbatim panels from the letter: (1) The "I consider" first-person assertion at page 5, § 5.3 — Cervera-Navas himself signs that the format is "compliant", "intelligible", "easily accessible" and ensures "transparency". (2) Page 2: "Up to now, the EDPS has provided the data subject with more than 3 000 pages of logs on consultation operations." (3) Page 4: "the EDPS provided logs on consultation operations in PDF format. Accessing such format does not require the data subject to buy software." (4) § 5.2: the same letter cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022 to concede that the format "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". (5) Page 5: "the picture of the log file … show[s] that information has not been tampered with" — in 2026, the year of AI-manipulated evidence. (6) Page 6: the closing word "Regulation" — the document's signature block shows it was signed by Cervera-Navas on 25 April 2025. Full letter PDF: https://www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply %20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf ]
@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 20, 2026, 9:45 PM

Y lo más grave: Leonardo Cervera Navas —Secretario General del EDPS— firmó la Decisión D(2025)1485 defendiendo que esas capturas "demuestran que la información no ha sido manipulada".
#CerveraNavas #EUDPR #RGPD #GDPR

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 18, 2026, 1:03 PM

@felixbolanosg.bsky.social, la doctrina del señor @cerveranavas.bsky.social
y @edps.europa.eu llega al #ático de la señora ayuso
@JotaVaquerizo @antoniomaestreh.bsky.social
@bilbaohiria y puede llegar al tribunal europeo de derechos humanos #TEDH #EUDPR #RGPD #EUCHR

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 13, 2026, 7:10 AM

OLAF complaint 22749 — filed 19 Sep 2025 under Reg. 883/2013 Art. 5(1). Open 11 months, no reply.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/OpenLetterReportingThePicturesofLogsToTheOLAF_WithAnnexI-signed.pdf

#EUDPR #OLAF

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 13, 2026, 7:06 AM

D(2025)1485 p. 5

Cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022: "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". Then claims 3,000 PNGs = transparency.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply%20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf

#EUDPR

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 13, 2026, 7:00 AM

Screenshots ≠ evidence.

Pixels ≠ data: not parseable, no chain of custody.

EDPB Guidelines: machine-readable logs required. 3,000 PNGs = none.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply%20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf

#EUDPR #EDPB #rightofaccess

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 13, 2026, 6:25 AM

OLAF complaint 22749 — filed 19 Sep 2025 under Reg. 883/2013 Art. 5(1). Open 11 months, no reply.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/OpenLetterReportingThePicturesofLogsToTheOLAF_WithAnnexI-signed.pdf

#EUDPR #OLAF

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 13, 2026, 6:20 AM

D(2025)1485 p. 5

Cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022: "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". Then claims 3,000 PNGs = transparency.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply%20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf

#EUDPR

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 13, 2026, 6:15 AM

Screenshots ≠ evidence.

Pixels ≠ data: not parseable, no chain of custody.

EDPB Guidelines: machine-readable logs required. 3,000 PNGs = none.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply%20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf

#EUDPR #EDPB #rightofaccess

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 12, 2026, 7:10 AM

OLAF complaint 22749 — filed 19 Sep 2025 under Reg. 883/2013 Art. 5(1). Open 11 months, no reply.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/OpenLetterReportingThePicturesofLogsToTheOLAF_WithAnnexI-signed.pdf

#EUDPR #OLAF

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 12, 2026, 7:05 AM

D(2025)1485 p. 5

Cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022: "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". Then claims 3,000 PNGs = transparency.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply%20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf

#EUDPR

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 12, 2026, 7:01 AM

Screenshots ≠ evidence.

Pixels ≠ data: not parseable, no chain of custody.

EDPB Guidelines: machine-readable logs required. 3,000 PNGs = none.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply%20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf

#EUDPR #EDPB #rightofaccess

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 12, 2026, 6:25 AM

OLAF complaint 22749 — filed 19 Sep 2025 under Reg. 883/2013 Art. 5(1). Open 11 months, no reply.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/OpenLetterReportingThePicturesofLogsToTheOLAF_WithAnnexI-signed.pdf

#EUDPR #OLAF

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 12, 2026, 6:20 AM

D(2025)1485 p. 5

Cites EDPB Guidelines 01/2022: "in practice no knowledge can easily be drawn from the log files". Then claims 3,000 PNGs = transparency.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply%20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf

#EUDPR

@juasiepo.bsky.socialSep 12, 2026, 6:15 AM

Screenshots ≠ evidence.

Pixels ≠ data: not parseable, no chain of custody.

EDPB Guidelines: machine-readable logs required. 3,000 PNGs = none.

www.elsotanillo.net/wp-content/uploads/EDPS/Reply%20letter%20to%20Mr%20Zerdick_2025-0348%20D(2025)%201485%20(25-04-25).pdf

#EUDPR #EDPB #rightofaccess

Load more