Grilled Cheese

ExploreLog inSign up
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyCommunity StandardsHelpGet the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-10 23:59:09 EDT

Explore

PostsPeople
LatestRanked
@tmlr-pub.bsky.socialOct 7, 2026, 4:20 PM

Geometric Uncertainty for Detecting and Correcting Hallucinations in LLMs

Edward Phillips, Sean Wu, Soheila Molaei et al.

Action editor: Jie Shen

https://openreview.net/forum?id=5UVv7gkgUD

#semantic #hallucinations #answering

@global-news-2024.bsky.socialSep 17, 2026, 7:41 PM

đź“° Can an AI chatbot save lives by answering texts about pregnancy?

Is swelling normal?

Source: NPR | Read story

đź’¬ What are your thoughts on this development?

#TechBluesky #Save #Answering

@rortyquotes.bsky.socialSep 15, 2026, 2:03 PM

My argument for dropping the notions of “answering” and “representing” is that they preserve an image of the relation between people and non-people which, in these lectures, I have been calling “authoritarian” and denouncing.
PasAA p.173
#Pragmatism
#Rorty
#Answering

The choice is between dropping the notions of “answering” and “representing” (though not those of “of” and “about”) and keeping them. My argument for dropping them is that they preserve an image of the relation between people and non-people which, in these lectures, I have been calling “authoritarian” and denouncing. I see both Brandom’s identification of calling an assertion “true” with endorsing it and Davidson’s refusal to define “true” as tools for persuading us to abandon this authoritarian image. But I see Brandom’s persistence in using the terms “getting right,” “really is” and “making true” as tools which will fall into authoritarian hands and be used for reactionary purposes.
@rortyquotes.bsky.socialSep 14, 2026, 2:02 PM

One should just stop answering altogether, thus avoiding the choice between answering to people and answering to nonpeople.
PasAA p.173
#Pragmatism
#Rorty
#Answering

One way of putting the issue is to revert to the words I put in Davidson’s mouth earlier, and to say that one should just stop answering altogether, thus avoiding the choice between answering to people and answering to nonpeople. As long as the latter choice is posed, one will count as a defender of objectivity merely by virtue of denying, as Brandom does, that truth can be identified with what people believe under certain conditions. But when Brandom then goes on to say that he identifies truth with answering to nonpeople, realists like Searle will ask him how he knows that he is giving the right answers.