@ioppublishing.bsky.social💙 Thank you to all our peer reviewers! Every review makes a difference. #TheDifferenceIMakeAsAReviewer
From improving rigour and accuracy to strengthening scientific discussion, you help authors enhance their research and advance knowledge worldwide.🤝
@ioppublishing.bsky.social🔍 How can peer review sharpen scientific discussion? #TheDifferenceIMakeAsAReviewer
For Dr Ema Yunita Titisari of Universitas Brawijaya, peer review is about helping authors strengthen the impact and value of their research. 🤝
#PeerReviewWeek2026 #PeerReviewWeek #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity
@pensoft.netAs #PeerReviewWeek comes to a close, we are wrapping up with words from Prof. @tbrresearch.bsky.social, E-i-C of @neobiota.pensoft.net on the future of #peerreview.
🙏Huge thanks to all our editors & reviewers for supporting quality #science!
📖Full blog: blog.pensoft.net/2026/09/11/p...
@freegardener.bsky.socialOpen peer review = fewer retractions? New study finds papers with public review reports retract less often. Transparency may signal #PeerReview #OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity #AcademicChatter
https://freegardner.com/sci_scout/open-peer-review-linked-to-fewer-retractions.html
@acadmedjournal.bsky.social📢 #PeerReviewWeek is here! Check out this AM Rounds blog series with tips from editors and peer reviewers. Hone your skills with this collection of free resources: https://bit.ly/41zSTUM. #PRW2026 #PeerReview #ScholarlyPublishing
@peerreviewcongress.bsky.social#PeerReview should evaluate not if a paper is the final word but what it establishes, what is uncertain, & whether its reasoning & evidence are sound, transparent, & defensible enough to support further examination
@ashutoshg.bsky.social
@scholarlykitchen.bsky.social
@peerreviewweek.bsky.social
@youngscinet.bsky.social📢 Interested in developing your peer-review skills?
Join the EFMC-YSN Reviewer Academy, powered by Chemistry Europe, and learn best practices directly from professional editors.
📅 15 Oct | 09:00–10:00 CET
🔗 www.efmc.info/reviewer-aca...
#EFMCYSN #ChemistryEurope #PeerReview
@prereview.bsky.socialIn conversation with the @theacse.bsky.social, Daniela draws on PREreview’s work to empower underrepresented perspectives in #PeerReview, and stresses the importance of power sharing for a more resilient ecosystem.
🎥 Watch the full interview: youtu.be/5bmxM1CEWWQ
@liversmdpi.bsky.social📢 Livers #Exceptional #Reviewers List 2026
🎉 Congratulations to our Q2 outstanding reviewer, Dr. Deborah Jean Verran of Ramsay Healthcare, Sydney, Australia!
📖 More details: www.mdpi.com/journal/live...
@reviewerone.bsky.socialA good review doesn't need to comment on everything.
When time is limited, the better question is which issues could actually change the assessment of the manuscript. Prioritizing those first can make the review more focused without making it less rigorous.
@physoc.bsky.socialOur #PeerReview team's expertise, commitment & care sits at the heart of the Society’s journals & the communities we serve. Lucinda Periac-Arnold (Associate Director of Publishing @physoc.bsky.social) shines a spotlight on the team & our peer review communities ⬇️ www.physoc.org/blog/celebra...
@eudch.bsky.social💎 A timely EDCH Forum discussion for #PeerReview Week this year focused on reviewer capacity.
The Diamond Reviewer Pledge invites researchers to commit to reviewing at least one article for a #DiamondOA journal in the next 12 months.
🔷 Take the pledge & join the discussion: tinyurl.com/56pwmkwm
@cambup-scieng.cambridge.org📝 New #OpenAccess article from the Editors-in-Chief of Data & Policy
'The peer review crisis and the future of scholarly publishing: notes from the editorial frontline' - Freely available to read here:️ https://cup.org/4dkBGnY
- Zeynep Engin, Jon Crowcroft & Stefaan Verhulst
@molecules-mdpi.bsky.social👀 Ever interested in participating in peer-review for @Molecules_MDPI ?
✏️ What makes a good peer-review report? What should you look for in a manuscript as a reviewer?
👉 Check the guidelines for reviewers: brnw.ch/21x5KEf
@reviewerone.bsky.socialCan #peerreview become faster without putting more pressure on reviewers?
Our latest #ReviewerInsights looks at how matching, clearer expectations, focused reports, and supportive technology can help improve efficiency without weakening rigor. buff.ly/kYsKVyC
@acadmedjournal.bsky.social🎉To celebrate #PeerReviewWeek, we encourage you to try this peer-review exercise. 🎉 Practice reviewing a Research Report submitted to Academic Medicine and compare your work to that of the actual reviewers: https://bit.ly/4hkFrw2. #PRW2026 #PeerReview #ScholarlyPublishing
@prereview.bsky.socialPREreview is participating in @sciencesummit.bsky.social!
Join Daniela on Sep 18 at the “Building Global Student Research Capacity Through Open Science Networks” session to discuss how to meaningfully engage ERCs in #PeerReview.
👉 Register now: event.sciencesummitnyc.org/list-of-sess...
@aspetjournals.bsky.socialHas the process of peer review fundamentally changed in scientific publishing? We asked John Tesmer, PhD, and Editor-in-Chief of Molecular Pharmacology, for his thoughts.
Learn more about Molecular Pharmacology: https://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/
@jmlmc.bsky.socialEvery engineering breakthrough begins with rigorous peer review.
From heat transfer and CFD to advanced materials and energy systems, reviewers help ensure engineering research is ready to make an impact.
Become a Begell House reviewer: www.begellhouse.com/authors/for_...
#Engineering #PeerReview
@begellmedical.bsky.socialEvery biomedical discovery is strengthened by rigorous peer review.
Researchers and scientists who share their expertise help improve the quality and integrity of the scientific record.
Join the Begell House reviewer community: www.begellhouse.com/authors/for_...
