@opg.optica.orgQuality reviews don't go unnoticed. Through the @OpticaPubsGroup Reviewer Recognition and Rewards Program, reviewers earn points for every useful review, redeemable for a free Optica membership or discount on APCs. Start earning yours this #PeerReviewWeek. https://bit.ly/4fcHr7l
@jexpbiol.bsky.socialOver the past 12 months, more than 80 ECRs have co-reviewed for the journal and we look forward to seeing more co-reviews over the coming year
Find out more at journals.biologists.com/jeb/pages/re...
@kwgloballtd.bsky.socialA reviewer’s attention is a finite resource. Can AI help us use it more wisely?
Katie Murphy of KGL and Jennifer Kuhn of The Permanente Journal discuss responsible AI, editorial triage, and reducing unnecessary demands on reviewers.
@peerreviewweek.bsky.social
@aga-cgh.bsky.socialThis #PeerReviewWeek 💫 CGH recognizes Dr. Joan Genescà as one of our top reviewers! His dedication to peer review has helped ensure scientific quality while advancing clinical practice and medical knowledge. Thank you Dr. Genescà!
@multi-ling-mat.bsky.socialNew blog post: Peer Review Week 2026
In this post our Editorial Director Anna Roderick explains why, despite its challenges, peer review is so important to us, and offers some top tips for reviewers.
@jcellsci.bsky.socialDid you know…
Through our publisher @biologists.bsky.social, we fund the restoration & preservation of ancient woodlands. These trees are dedicated to our peer reviewers. The trees are also represented in our virtual forest: forest.biologists.com/landscape/
@ariessystems.bsky.socialIn this guest post, Aries' Senior Account Manager Elysia Williams reflects on her experience in academia and how AI, processes, and policies can connect to create more capacity for peer reviewers: bit.ly/3T7fKG8
@ami-journals.bsky.socialTo mark #PeerReviewWeek, we’re celebrating the Junior Reviewers taking part in the Letters in Applied Microbiology training programme. 📝🔬
Meet Dr Rabiath Féichokpè Raïssa Adigoun, who reflects on her scientific journey and experience of the programme so far.
🔗 Read the Q&A buff.ly/3pWVjw9
@cos.ioThis #PeerReviewWeek, check out the growing collection of research & completed evaluations published through Lifecycle Journal!
Lifecycle Journal makes evaluations part of the public record, giving readers an opportunity to see research alongside its evaluation. Learn more: lifecyclejournal.org...
@uncpress.bsky.socialA great read from our friends at the University of Michigan Press for #PeerReviewWeek!
@h-net-journals.bsky.socialH-Net Journals has a growing portfolio of peer reviewed publications, discussed in this morning's post from #FeedingTheElephant. Can more novel forms of peer review improve volume, speed, and quality--the theme of #PeerReviewWeek this year?
@hnetbookchannel.bsky.social#FeedingTheElephant continues to celebrate #PeerReviewWeek. This morning, @emily-elliott.bsky.social considers how @h-net-journals.bsky.social's embrace of novel forms of peer review and innovative publishing practices has affected volume, speed, and quality.
@aip-publishing.bsky.socialWhat can 35,000+ manuscript submissions teach us about peer review integrity? This #PeerReviewWeek, explore what AIP Publishing’s data reveals about balancing author-suggested and editor-selected reviewers.
Learn more 👇
https://aippub.org/46PfsH4
@agu.orgAGU's volunteer peer reviewers help advance the Earth and space sciences and maintain the integrity and accountability of the scientific record. 🚀
If you are interested in joining AGU's pool of reviewers, please fill out our interest form: bit.ly/4yx8H8L
@biologyopen.bsky.social"I found the review process fair, transparent and quick, and appreciated the ease of editing proofs." #PeerReviewWeek
Read Angelo's paper: doi.org/10.1242/bio....
Browse the Fast & Fair collection: journals.biologists.com/bio/collecti...
@reviewerone.bsky.socialFaster #peerreview should not mean rushed judgment.
What would help you review more efficiently without lowering quality: clearer criteria, better matching, realistic deadlines, or practical tools?
#PRW2026 #PeerReviewWeek #ReviewerCommunity #AcademicSky #PeerReviewSkills #ResearchIntegrity
@jexpbiol.bsky.socialPeer review is a key skill that all ECRs need to develop, so JEB encourages the participation of postdocs & early-career scientists by offering the opportunity to co-review with a senior colleague
@botanyjournal.bsky.socialWhat does it take to make statistical analyses and data reproducible?
For #PeerReviewWeek, the companion post to “Writing replicable and reproducible methods” is on preparing statistical analyses and data for replication and reproduction. Read here 💡▶️ https://ow.ly/6nOO50ZMJKx
@dmmjournal.bsky.social#DidYouKnow that DMM encourages co-reviewing? PIs - involve post-docs and other early-career scientists in your peer review process! #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2026
Find out more in our reviewer guide journals.biologists.com/dmm/pages/re...
@apnmjournal.bsky.socialHow can researchers make their methods easier to replicate and reproduce?
This #PeerReviewWeek, Canadian Science Publishing is releasing a two-part blog series on several ways to prepare replicable and reproducible methods. Read Part I ▶️ https://ow.ly/pvIb50ZMIqz
