Who is entitled to define national identity?
My latest Substack post is a more personal piece which explores questions of Britishness, Zionism, history and belonging.
You can read it here:

@legalmusings.bsky.social
Barrister. Commentator. Visiting Prof @ Durham University. Former parliamentary lawyer & special adviser UK Parliament (JCHR, EU, Women & Equalities; International Agreements). Musings on law, politics & restaurants . Personal views. š¬š§š§šŖš®š± šLDN/BX
I wonder if a Le Pen presidency would make the idea of rejoining rather toxic for the sort of Remainers who havenāt noticed some of the changes in the bloc since 2016? Also, factor in the rise of China and increasing EU protectionism. The economic draw may not be what it was either?
ICYMI yesterday, I wrote a rather personal piece which was provoked by the Green Partyās recent motion on Zionism and Restore Britainās position on Britishness. To my mind, each is problematic and it led me to ponder on history and belonging.
It is telling that the Irish Government (which intervened in the ICJ case) wants the court to interpret the Genocide Convention more flexibly. But that was never the intention of the drafters.
As a war. Genocide has a specific legal definition. The deaths of civilians can be tragic without amounting to genocide. Have a look at the number of civilians thought to have died following the US/UK coalition wars in the Middle East post-9/11.
Who is entitled to define national identity?
My latest Substack post is a more personal piece which explores questions of Britishness, Zionism, history and belonging.
You can read it here:
My point was not advocating for some mythical invocation of āBritishnessā, but rather to say that Restore Britainās Ethnonationalist approach is ridiculous. To be honest, if someone asks me where I come from, Iād say London.
If Scotland were to become independent, or Northern Ireland were to become united with the Republic, I hope that we wouldnāt see citizenship granted on the basis that Restore Britain are suggesting! (2/2).
I canāt agree with this Iām afraid. It may well be that some people in the component nation states that make up the U.K. have aspirations for independence. Thatās a very different point from the sort of issues that I discuss in my essay. (1/2).
Who is entitled to define national identity?
My latest Substack post is a more personal piece which explores questions of Britishness, Zionism, history and belonging.
You can read it here:
Depressing to see that, despite all the press coverage, 8,928 people went out to vote for a racist party in Holborn and St Pancras that is calling for the destruction of the worldās only Jewish state. I guess Jews still donāt count.
I donāt see how membership of EFTA would be incompatible with anything the U.K. currently wishes to do?
What exactly stopped the SNP holding its conference in Aberdeen during the actual conference recess, rather than skipping school during term time? I can only guess that itās because they donāt have much time for the Westminster Parliament?
I mean Iām not sure that all the EU member states will be super keen to have the U.K. back either!
Yes, but the Westminster Parliament is back from recess next week. So conference season is over. If the SNP prefers to gather in Aberdeen, thatās fair enough. But political life will go on without them.
The article discusses some of these points in detail. The concept (if I can put it that way) is of a European neighbourhood with an outer layer (including the U.K. and Switzerland as well as the EEA countries) in the Single Market, but not in āthe projectā.
I am not the comedian Iām afraid (as much as it might seem that way sometimes)!
Conference season is over and Labour has reintroduced some Brexit-related drama into our lives. But instead of fixating on customs unions or joining the EU, perhaps Burnham might consider the most obvious off-the-shelf option: the EEA?
alexanderhorne.substack.com/p/why-isnt-a...
Conference season is over and Labour has reintroduced some Brexit-related drama into our lives. But instead of fixating on customs unions or joining the EU, perhaps Burnham might consider the most obvious off-the-shelf option: the EEA?
alexanderhorne.substack.com/p/why-isnt-a...
I am a secular Jew, a dual national of the UK š¬š§ and Israel š®š± and now live part-time in Belgiumš§šŖ . I am a Zionist. If you think that makes me a racist, then please feel free to unfollow me. Am Yisrael Chai. Thanks for reading.
I tend to agree. Although I guess itās better than some of the modern āomakaseā options and set menus where the chef doesnāt even seem to care what you like or donāt like! Ideally, I prefer a good varied Ć la carte menu.