And so the "brilliant" Peter Gelderloos has blocked me now. Good riddance, i guess. Tired of reading his self-righteous takes anyway.

Oh no!? That tired turd again?! Everyone knows how the terms left-right originated in the seating order of the French parliament centuries ago. That's an old hat. But you are a literalist if you insist on the relevance of its historical origin. Wouldn't you agree that language keeps evolving?

Well, there you go again. Confirming what i always say about you. You may write ABOUT anarchism. But you do not write LIKE one.

I admit i stopped reading once i clocked that it was once again your "actually anarchists are not on the left" argument, it is getting preachy, man. And boring.

I (as one person who continues to beg people to please mask during an ongoing pandemic) am extremely offended by being called a delusional narcissist because of that humble request, that mostly gets ignored btw. In reality i get ostracized by my former comrades & friends into total social isolation.

One person in particular, a trans poc, received massive racist abuse afterwards, even before you "diagnosed" them with "delusional narcissism". Later you write "Delusional Narcissists Are Still Exploiting the Pandemic". In reality most people who continue to wear masks are immunocompromised or ill.

“The children who are randomly selected not to receive the birth dose of the vaccine, those who “lost the lottery”, face in their earliest days the risk of contracting hepatitis B, which can cause irreversible lifelong damage.” No words. I am speechless. This violates all ethical boundaries.

If you agree that Somebody Has to Do It, Mamdani had by now two excellent opportunities to do it, more like penalties really, and did not take them. This will forever be Mamdani's legacy.

Of course i have very little in common with a leftist-centrist like Mamdani. But at times i find it important to find common ground. We certainly don't need more division, if things should ever change. And by being arrogant and self-righteous we certainly won't convince anyone to join our ranks.

Thought experiment: If i proudly say that i consider myself to be an anarchist and also part of the Left, what would you tell me? Would you tell that me that i am wrong (which you kinda do in the article)? That i am misinformed? And who would give you the authority to tell me that?

Today we have people on the right who think of themselves as anarchists, meaning they are against the state. Many among us would argue, that those are not real anarchists. But that's just arrogant. They could claim the same about us. To distinguish ourselves from them we need the right-left axis

Since then what left or right means, has been filled with meaning, a meaning that keeps changing, at times in subtle, sometimes in drastic ways. Of course anarchists are part of "the Left", or rather, they can be. I would add "radical" or another descriptor to distinguish them from say centrists.

Oh no!? That tired turd again?! Everyone knows how the terms left-right originated in the seating order of the French parliament centuries ago. That's an old hat. But you are a literalist if you insist on the relevance of its historical origin. Wouldn't you agree that language keeps evolving?

Je ne suis plus du tout sure que cela soi la bonne strategie. On l'a essayé dans les debuts de Trump.01. Le problème se constitue car leurs propos reste sans contradictions. C'est plus pour les autres lecteurs, que pour l'interaction avec eux, mais il faut contredire. Truth-sandwich, d'après Lakoff.

Wo könnten deutschweizerische Abolitionist·inn·en niemals wohnen? In Bulle.

AI safety expert Timnit Gebru says tech leaders are promoting greatly exaggerated claims about "superintelligence" and "existential risk" as a way to distract from the real threat — their own unregulated companies.