Clarification noted!

Maybe with that money he can buy a human smile

Can confirm she is perfect. (Not enough context to determine tininess)

When he said he doesn’t like how Ken Paxton dresses i thought “somehow this is projection like all his accusations and insults” and here we are

When he said he doesn’t like how Ken Paxton dresses i thought “somehow this is projection like all his accusations and insults” and here we are

washington square park

Oh noes I lerv him

Quite the framing: He's not a bigot -- WE'RE being "sensitive." One step away from "can't you take a joke?"

Wrong, every voter of faith who votes for Democrats understands that they don't want religion mixed up in government. The ones who want (their) religion as a basis for laws are voting Republican.

This is what you don’t get. When you make excuses for anti-trans democrats, YOU ARE HELPING REPUBLICANS GET ELECTED.

And we'd probably have closer to 70-80% voter participation, at least in the presidential election years.

This is the correct take. I know they held up "Mass Deportation Now" signs at the '24 GOP convention, but I don't recall "Summary Executions Now" signs.* *Tho obvs plenty of Magats are fine with it

Otis Redding, I think, not Berry

My answer to the @MuckRack Daily trivia question: I had to look it up, and I must say I would never in a million years have guessed Hillary Clinton.

I'm not sure anyone will get that he's joking. I'm not so sure myself.

My answer to the @MuckRack Daily trivia question: Sputnik!

It’s very simple and it’s been said over and over but I guess it needs saying continuously: if you deem one group too small to have equal rights you are enabling fascism, not fighting it. The people saying Dems are GREAT on trans rights are not paying attention and/or saying stuff like this.