lol. No one missed the point. You just can’t fucking read.

Nope. But you’ve made it pretty clear you know jack shit about this subject matter.

Streaming is not broadcast. And no, you aren’t getting the indecency regs correct either. Again… I get what you were going for but the analogy doesn’t work.

Top ten most foreboding sentence I've ever read.

Not quite.

It’s not hypocritical though. That’s the point. If the analogy worked you’d have a point. It doesn’t. Your comparison is dumb. That you keep defending it is also rather dumb. Move on.

Hard to do since they don’t have one.

There’s no such thing as a “news license”.

Wild you can’t read. No one called anyone dumb. And I literally explained I understood what you were going for. The joke doesn’t land because the analogy is dumb. Maybe next time.

So then why are you commenting on U.S. law if you admit you don’t know it?

Idiot. Fox News is a CABLE CHANNEL. Why the fuck do you think FCC policies apply to those?

Fox News is a CABLE CHANNEL. Why the fuck do you think FCC policies apply to those?

You fool. Most every broadcaster and 1A champion wanted it gone. Stop pretending you know this subject matter. You don’t.

Don’t post dumb articles on this app.

I get your point but the analogy is dumb. You’re trying to apply narrow OTA regs to streaming content to make the point and it doesn’t work that way.

You think FCC regs apply to streaming content?

lol. You cannot read. The FD never required equal time and never regulated news and FCC policies apply to local broadcast stations (not networks) and again: Them not covering Trump (and they are) has NOTHING to do with that old policy. Take a seat.

That’s correct. But that has nothing to do with the old FCC policy.

I’m aware of that. I’m referring only to the mention of the gov regs.