It’s hard for me to see the problem with a simple labeling reg that requires the menu to say “NOTICE: food at this establishment is not kosher or pareve“, and in this particular case the inspector appears to have given the owner two chances to correct the violation and was told to pound sand
See, e.g., New York AGRIC. & MKTS. LAW §§ 201-B, 201-D
According to this 1998 law review, at the time there were similar laws on the books in 20 states (see footnote 58)
It's based on a consumer protection / notice law NJ enacted in 1994 following a 1992 NJ supreme court decision which struck down a previous consumer protection law on Establishment Clause grounds that had expressly incorporatedkashrut into the law
scholar.google.com/scholar_case...
It's a civil fine
My dad's mother used to take us to an Italian-owned place on Route 130 in Bordentown that had a deli-style menu and catered b'nai mitzvot on-site (and was forced into permanent closure during COVID)
I mean there's no religious monopoly on pastrami
Anosh Ahmed only finished his residency around 2017, and by 2021 was COO & CFO of Chicago's Loretto Hospital He left, and misappropriated personal data of 150,000 patients to help effectuate mass false claims for reimbursement for PCR COVID tests meant for uninsured ppl, to the tune of $300 million
I don't understand this point There are plenty of non-Jewish owners and Jewish owners of Jewish-style delicatessens in New Jersey, and the rule has no bearing on the product or the owner's personal practices
*September 16–17 (The Inquirer links a few pages of the notices, including the inspector's one-page affidavit)
The rule applies equally to anyone who meets these criteria, though, not based on the owner's religion, just the indicia on the menu, displays, and website
In this particular case the owner seems to have needlessly dug in his heels The article quotes the inspector as having twice given the owner, on the phone and in-person on Sept. 27–28, an opportunity to correct the violation, and he was told to pound sand The owner doesn't deny it
Eh, it's how does it infringe the owner's beliefs to publicly disclose what the product is or isn't? The rule just requires the menu to display "NOTICE: The food sold at this establishment is not kosher or pareve" in 10-point font See § 13:45A-21.7(a)(5)(iii) on page 122–23
Yet in Churchill’s 1947 essay about meeting his father in a dream and telling him about the previous 50 years, Churchill feels the need to explain what the term “OK” means
Like of course Palmer Lackey would not interpret Robocop as cautionary satire Lackey is a fascist who believes Verhoeven’s perspective on policing, violence, crime, and corporations is wrong
It’s often said the Right doesn’t understand Apocalypse Now, Robocop, Starship Troopers, Fight Club, The Matrix, etc., but generally I don’t think it’s a failure to comprehend the work, it’s different (shittier) values & perspectives They don’t misunderstand Verhoeven’s message, they reject it
most niche dunk so far (laudatory)
really more like c.1528 even
the Online Etymology Dictionary says it records the first use in print of “moron” as an insult in 1918
