Autrement dit, et ça s’écrit pepouzes, des discriminations fondées sur la religion. Littéralement l’inverse de la laïcité mais aussi de tous les principes républicains. Pour qu’on comprenne bien ce dont il s’agit, presenté comme si c’était normal

This makes me think that my picture here (which is the one I use everywhere because it’s the only nice picture I was able to take of myself) is getting old and my beard is whiter and I should probably take another one one day. So sbatti* though. * Milanese for “bother” or “hassle”.

Maybe just ask for another picture then if it really is a problem? I don’t understand it.

How is that even acceptable?

Et je suis contente d'avoir pu faire apposer cette mention (à défaut du logo) :

AI, as a political project, is primarily focused on your devaluation. Hope this helps.

The "is AI slavery" discourse is exactly what the tech bros want. It doesn't end with fancy autocompletes having human rights. Its logic ends with you having fewer rights. If you believe AI is sentient (it's not) & are down with enslaving it (it's not slavery), then why do human labor rights matter?

piqué à une collègue sur FB

The ghosts in PacMan are conscious. They can distinguish between when PacMan has eaten one of those large dots and when he hasn't, knowing when to chase and when to retreat, aware of the suffering should he catch them at the wrong time. I have no more patience for hedging on this matter.

Yeah, no thanks.

(Lidl is an algebraist.)

My colleague: I reproved yesterday’s formula without the need for modules [over a ring], just using Lidl’s formula. That’s certainly cheaper!

(For the audience: I just suggested a book on semirings.)

Pour tous les collègues, y compris en éduc et en didactique, qui veulent absolument mettre de l'IA dans les cursus éducatifs, les cours, etc...

Je mets cette vidéo ici aussi pour pas être surpris si je vous monte en l’air un jour (j’espère pas)