I looked this up and discovered it's a porn movie because of course it is boxd.it/KAZU
Ruin a book by adding a word Lord of the Cock Rings
#22 is The Autopsy of Jane Doe (2016). A compelling mystery, a spooky haunting, characters elbow-deep in viscera. What's not to love? Well, a slightly better resolution to the films various plotlines would have been welcome but the ride is thrilling enough. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aut...
I've never played Inquisitor but perhaps it is, in some ways, the 40k equivalent to Underworlds I've lusted after for years
This is some next-level ass-covering
Why yes, I am eating entire jalapeno slices just to feel something. Why do you ask?
Ils étaient mi-cerf mi-escargot, et re mi-cerf derrière
09 Oct was X (2022). While the core of the movie is a typical slasher, there are several things about it that make it stand out. Stylish cinematography and editing for one, and a variety of troubling questions about generational friction and sex for another. 4/5 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_(2022...
#23 is 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple (2026) - touching on the regular franchise themes but with additional clarity, highlighting how we're tearing down everything humanity has worked hard to build, and Fiennes' performance with Maiden was a stupendous spectacle. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/28_Year...
Hah, what a fantastic way of putting it!
Very much an Occam's razor thing, this. It's not "pushing" people to lose social skills but it was absolutely developed by nerds (like me) as a way of socialising without needing to deploy social skills.
Just watched X and I must say I'm very disappointed that Jenny Ortega had "Sunday" written on her pants when it should surely be "Wednesday"
Yeah I mean it works fine as entertainment, which is the point. And, arguably, as a social game too. It's just to nerds like us that it looks weird :) I think it's very telling that the one time they had a game player on, they got voted off fairly early.
As entertainment, yes. But as a game, very much not. In fact to me it's the other way round - allowing them to keep recruitung spoils the premise of the game as a win/lose affair.
Yes, they can just keep recruiting. I know the target can say "no" but given the potential that there number will always be three, it hugely devalues the importance of catching a traitor in the vote
As a gamer, I continue to find the rules of The Traitors annoying enough that it feels irritating to watch. If the traitors can just recruit someone every time they lose a member, what's the point of voting any of them off?
Jesus have you not seen what happens in that movie?!
JFC. The implications for copyrighted software are vast but the implications for malware delivery are possibly even vast-er.
Iliad, Moytura, Cascadero are all absolutely fresh fantastic games from Bitewing that are not (AFAIK) reprints. They have some others like Spectral & Bebop that are solid. I know those KS games are based on video game titles but they're still novel as tabletop adaptations.
It certainly didn't pull punches, and I'll say that it's the best film in that franchise by a good way, too.
