explore | Grilled Cheese

Explore Log in Sign up

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Community Standards Help Get the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-17 11:32:24 EDT

Photos Videos All People

Philadelphia Flyers skaters, PHI 1–2 OTT: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Travis Konecny +1.44 net xG (2.08 for, 0.64 against). Toughest: Cam York −1.09 (0.28 for, 1.37 against).

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Ottawa Senators 2, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PHI attacks the left net, OTT the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PHI 3.67, OTT 2.52; shots on goal 29–26; attempts 64–49. The Senators beat the Flyers 2–1 at home despite being out-created 3.7–2.5 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Flyers power play made 1.4 xG on 14 attempts.

Philadelphia Flyers skaters, PHI 1–2 OTT: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Travis Konecny +1.44 net xG (2.08 for, 0.64 against). Toughest: Cam York −1.09 (0.28 for, 1.37 against).

San Jose Sharks Impact Card

St. Louis Blues Impact Card

Hype Window alert card. San Jose Sharks 2 @ St. Louis Blues 2. Drop Everything, hype 86 out of 100.

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Ottawa Senators 2, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PHI attacks the left net, OTT the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PHI 3.71, OTT 2.52; shots on goal 30–26; attempts 64–49. The Senators beat the Flyers 2–1 at home despite being out-created 3.7–2.5 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Flyers power play made 1.4 xG on 15 attempts.

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Ottawa Senators 2, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PHI attacks the left net, OTT the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PHI 3.71, OTT 2.52; shots on goal 30–26; attempts 64–49. The Senators beat the Flyers 2–1 at home despite being out-created 3.7–2.5 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Flyers power play made 1.4 xG on 15 attempts.

Nashville Predators 5, Montréal Canadiens 2, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: NSH attacks the left net, MTL the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals NSH 1.85, MTL 3.27; shots on goal 18–34; attempts 43–66. The Predators beat the Canadiens 5–2 on the road despite being out-created 3.3–1.8 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Predators power play made 1.0 xG on 12 attempts.

Utah Mammoth 1, Boston Bruins 6, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: UTA attacks the left net, BOS the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals UTA 5.19, BOS 2.02; shots on goal 37–22; attempts 80–34. The Bruins beat the Mammoth 6–1 at home despite being out-created 5.2–2.0 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. BOS scored 6 on 2.0 expected.

Minnesota Wild 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: MIN attacks the left net, TBL the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals MIN 4.28, TBL 3.38; shots on goal 35–35; attempts 61–70. The Lightning beat the Wild 3–2 at home despite being out-created 4.3–3.4 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Wild power play made 1.3 xG on 11 attempts.

Dallas Stars 4, Buffalo Sabres 0, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: DAL attacks the left net, BUF the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals DAL 2.72, BUF 5.68; shots on goal 18–26; attempts 39–63. The Stars beat the Sabres 4–0 on the road despite being out-created 5.7–2.7 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Stars power play made 0.8 xG on 6 attempts.

Vancouver Canucks 2, Carolina Hurricanes 7, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: VAN attacks the left net, CAR the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals VAN 1.84, CAR 4.82; shots on goal 20–34; attempts 41–54. The Hurricanes beat the Canucks 7–2 at home, and the chances agreed: CAR out-created VAN 4.8–1.8 in expected goals. CAR scored 7 on 4.8 expected.

Vancouver Canucks skaters, VAN 2–7 CAR: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Elias Pettersson +0.17 net xG (1.25 for, 1.08 against). Toughest: Max Sasson −1.54 (0.06 for, 1.60 against).

Hype Window alert card. San Jose Sharks 2 @ St. Louis Blues 2. Must Watch, hype 75 out of 100.

Chicago Blackhawks Impact Card

New York Islanders Impact Card

Photo, no description

Vancouver Canucks 2, Carolina Hurricanes 7, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: VAN attacks the left net, CAR the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals VAN 1.84, CAR 4.52; shots on goal 20–33; attempts 41–53. The Hurricanes beat the Canucks 7–2 at home, and the chances agreed: CAR out-created VAN 4.5–1.8 in expected goals. CAR scored 7 on 4.5 expected.