explore | Grilled Cheese

Explore Log in Sign up

Terms of Use Privacy Policy Community Standards Help Get the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-17 03:54:26 EDT

Photos Videos All People

Nashville Predators skaters, NSH 5–2 MTL: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Filip Forsberg +0.59 net xG (1.21 for, 0.62 against). Toughest: Adam Wilsby −1.20 (0.33 for, 1.54 against).

Utah Mammoth 1, Boston Bruins 6, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: UTA attacks the left net, BOS the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals UTA 4.65, BOS 2.09; shots on goal 37–22; attempts 80–35. The Bruins beat the Mammoth 6–1 at home despite being out-created 4.6–2.1 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. BOS scored 6 on 2.1 expected.

Utah Mammoth skaters, UTA 1–6 BOS: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Vincent Trocheck +1.67 net xG (2.23 for, 0.56 against). Toughest: Kevin Stenlund −0.29 (0.41 for, 0.70 against).

Minnesota Wild 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: MIN attacks the left net, TBL the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals MIN 3.33, TBL 3.71; shots on goal 36–35; attempts 62–70. The Lightning beat the Wild 3–2 at home in a game the chances called about even, MIN 3.3 to TBL 3.7 in expected goals. The Wild power play made 0.8 xG on 13 attempts.

Minnesota Wild skaters, MIN 2–3 TBL: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Quinn Hughes +0.94 net xG (2.86 for, 1.92 against). Toughest: Michael McCarron −0.77 (0.51 for, 1.28 against).

Dallas Stars 4, Buffalo Sabres 0, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: DAL attacks the left net, BUF the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals DAL 2.17, BUF 2.39; shots on goal 18–26; attempts 39–63. The Stars beat the Sabres 4–0 on the road in a game the chances called about even, DAL 2.2 to BUF 2.4 in expected goals. At 5v5: DAL 1.4, BUF 2.2.

Dallas Stars skaters, DAL 4–0 BUF: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Jason Robertson +0.97 net xG (1.28 for, 0.31 against). Toughest: Justin Hryckowian −0.87 (0.04 for, 0.91 against).

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Ottawa Senators 2, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PHI attacks the left net, OTT the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PHI 3.67, OTT 2.52; shots on goal 29–26; attempts 64–49. The Senators beat the Flyers 2–1 at home despite being out-created 3.7–2.5 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Flyers power play made 1.4 xG on 14 attempts.

Philadelphia Flyers skaters, PHI 1–2 OTT: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Travis Konecny +1.44 net xG (2.08 for, 0.64 against). Toughest: Cam York −1.09 (0.28 for, 1.37 against).

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Ottawa Senators 2, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PHI attacks the left net, OTT the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PHI 3.67, OTT 2.52; shots on goal 29–26; attempts 64–49. The Senators beat the Flyers 2–1 at home despite being out-created 3.7–2.5 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Flyers power play made 1.4 xG on 14 attempts.

Philadelphia Flyers skaters, PHI 1–2 OTT: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Travis Konecny +1.44 net xG (2.08 for, 0.64 against). Toughest: Cam York −1.09 (0.28 for, 1.37 against).

San Jose Sharks Impact Card

St. Louis Blues Impact Card

Hype Window alert card. San Jose Sharks 2 @ St. Louis Blues 2. Drop Everything, hype 86 out of 100.

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Ottawa Senators 2, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PHI attacks the left net, OTT the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PHI 3.71, OTT 2.52; shots on goal 30–26; attempts 64–49. The Senators beat the Flyers 2–1 at home despite being out-created 3.7–2.5 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Flyers power play made 1.4 xG on 15 attempts.

Philadelphia Flyers 1, Ottawa Senators 2, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PHI attacks the left net, OTT the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PHI 3.71, OTT 2.52; shots on goal 30–26; attempts 64–49. The Senators beat the Flyers 2–1 at home despite being out-created 3.7–2.5 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Flyers power play made 1.4 xG on 15 attempts.

Nashville Predators 5, Montréal Canadiens 2, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: NSH attacks the left net, MTL the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals NSH 1.85, MTL 3.27; shots on goal 18–34; attempts 43–66. The Predators beat the Canadiens 5–2 on the road despite being out-created 3.3–1.8 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Predators power play made 1.0 xG on 12 attempts.

Utah Mammoth 1, Boston Bruins 6, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: UTA attacks the left net, BOS the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals UTA 5.19, BOS 2.02; shots on goal 37–22; attempts 80–34. The Bruins beat the Mammoth 6–1 at home despite being out-created 5.2–2.0 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. BOS scored 6 on 2.0 expected.

Minnesota Wild 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: MIN attacks the left net, TBL the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals MIN 4.28, TBL 3.38; shots on goal 35–35; attempts 61–70. The Lightning beat the Wild 3–2 at home despite being out-created 4.3–3.4 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Wild power play made 1.3 xG on 11 attempts.

Dallas Stars 4, Buffalo Sabres 0, Oct 8, 2026. Full-rink shot map: DAL attacks the left net, BUF the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals DAL 2.72, BUF 5.68; shots on goal 18–26; attempts 39–63. The Stars beat the Sabres 4–0 on the road despite being out-created 5.7–2.7 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. The Stars power play made 0.8 xG on 6 attempts.