Grilled Cheese

ExploreLog inSign up
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyCommunity StandardsHelpGet the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-16 04:27:01 EDT

PhotosVideosAllPeople
LatestRanked
Load more
@xjawn.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:22 AM

Ducks vs. Jets 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: ANA attacks the left net, WPG the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; shots on goal 16–16; attempts 35–53. The Ducks beat the Jets 5–1 on the road in a game the chances called about even, ANA 2.5 to WPG 2.1 in expected goals. The Jets power play made 1.0 xG on 15 attempts.
@xjawn.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:22 AM

Ducks vs. Jets player stats (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Ducks, Judd Caulfield +0.96 · Jets, Gabriel Vilardi +0.59

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks skaters, ANA 5–1 WPG: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Judd Caulfield +0.96 net xG (1.07 for, 0.11 against). Toughest: Pavel Mintyukov −0.80 (0.26 for, 1.06 against).Winnipeg Jets skaters, WPG 1–5 ANA: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Gabriel Vilardi +0.59 net xG (0.93 for, 0.34 against). Toughest: Vladislav Namestnikov −1.04 (0.28 for, 1.32 against).Anaheim Ducks lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Killorn – Greer – Poehling 10 min together, +0.43 net xG; D1 LaCombe – Warren 22 min together, +0.08 net xG.Winnipeg Jets lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Scheifele – Connor – Perfetti 21 min together, +0.57 net xG; D1 DeMelo – Samberg 15 min together, +0.31 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1
NHL · Oct 9, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Ducks 2.55, Jets 2.10

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: ANA attacks the left net, WPG the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; shots on goal 16–16; attempts 35–53. The Ducks beat the Jets 5–1 on the road in a game the chances called about even, ANA 2.5 to WPG 2.1 in expected goals. The Jets power play made 1.0 xG on 15 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative ANA minus WPG xG, above zero when ANA is ahead on chances, below when WPG is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; score 5–1.
@xjawn.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1
NHL · Oct 9, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Ducks 2.55, Jets 2.10

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: ANA attacks the left net, WPG the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; shots on goal 16–16; attempts 35–53. The Ducks beat the Jets 5–1 on the road in a game the chances called about even, ANA 2.5 to WPG 2.1 in expected goals. The Jets power play made 1.0 xG on 15 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative ANA minus WPG xG, above zero when ANA is ahead on chances, below when WPG is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; score 5–1.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Penguins vs. Blue Jackets 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020068
#LetsGoPens #CBJ #NHL #hockey

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PIT attacks the left net, CBJ the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PIT 2.96, CBJ 4.91; shots on goal 22–45; attempts 49–83. The Blue Jackets beat the Penguins 3–2 in a shootout at home, and the chances agreed: CBJ out-created PIT 4.9–3.0 in expected goals. The Blue Jackets power play made 1.0 xG on 14 attempts.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Penguins vs. Blue Jackets player stats (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Penguins, Ben Kindel +0.54 · Blue Jackets, Charlie Coyle +1.90

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020068
#LetsGoPens #CBJ #NHL #hockey

Pittsburgh Penguins skaters, PIT 2–3 CBJ: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Ben Kindel +0.54 net xG (1.07 for, 0.53 against). Toughest: Trevor van Riemsdyk −1.85 (0.49 for, 2.34 against).Columbus Blue Jackets skaters, CBJ 3–2 PIT: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Charlie Coyle +1.90 net xG (2.94 for, 1.03 against). Toughest: Ryan Lomberg −0.11 (0.21 for, 0.32 against).Pittsburgh Penguins lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Crosby – Rust – Rakell 10 min together, −0.99 net xG; D1 Girard – Korczak 16 min together, −0.55 net xG.Columbus Blue Jackets lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Johnson – Knies – Fantilli 15 min together, +0.95 net xG; D1 Severson – Werenski 15 min together, +0.62 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Rangers vs. Capitals 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020067
#NYR #ALLCAPS #NHL #hockey

New York Rangers 1, Washington Capitals 3, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: NYR attacks the left net, WSH the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals NYR 2.52, WSH 3.41; shots on goal 22–26; attempts 50–50. The Capitals beat the Rangers 3–1 at home, and the chances agreed: WSH out-created NYR 3.4–2.5 in expected goals. The Rangers power play made 1.0 xG on 17 attempts.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Rangers vs. Capitals player stats (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Rangers, Adam Fox +1.20 · Capitals, Alex Ovechkin +1.00

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020067
#NYR #ALLCAPS #NHL #hockey

New York Rangers skaters, NYR 1–3 WSH: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Adam Fox +1.20 net xG (1.84 for, 0.64 against). Toughest: Sean Durzi −1.60 (0.37 for, 1.97 against).Washington Capitals skaters, WSH 3–1 NYR: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Alex Ovechkin +1.00 net xG (1.05 for, 0.05 against). Toughest: Martin Fehervary −0.58 (0.63 for, 1.21 against).New York Rangers lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Zibanejad – Lafrenière – Perreault 12 min together, +0.54 net xG; D1 Gavrikov – Fox 15 min together, +0.32 net xG.Washington Capitals lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Wilson – Tuch – Dubois 13 min together, −0.25 net xG; D1 Chychrun – Liljegren 15 min together, +0.10 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 2:44 AM

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 3 (SO)
NHL · Oct 9, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Penguins 2.93, Blue Jackets 4.61

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020068
#LetsGoPens #CBJ #NHL #hockey

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PIT attacks the left net, CBJ the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PIT 2.93, CBJ 4.61; shots on goal 22–45; attempts 49–83. The Blue Jackets beat the Penguins 3–2 in a shootout at home, and the chances agreed: CBJ out-created PIT 4.6–2.9 in expected goals. The Blue Jackets power play made 1.0 xG on 14 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative PIT minus CBJ xG, above zero when PIT is ahead on chances, below when CBJ is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG PIT 2.93, CBJ 4.61; score 2–3.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 2:44 AM

New York Rangers 1, Washington Capitals 3
NHL · Oct 9, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Rangers 2.50, Capitals 3.41

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020067
#NYR #ALLCAPS #NHL #hockey

New York Rangers 1, Washington Capitals 3, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: NYR attacks the left net, WSH the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals NYR 2.50, WSH 3.41; shots on goal 23–26; attempts 50–50. The Capitals beat the Rangers 3–1 at home, and the chances agreed: WSH out-created NYR 3.4–2.5 in expected goals. The Rangers power play made 1.0 xG on 17 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative NYR minus WSH xG, above zero when NYR is ahead on chances, below when WSH is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG NYR 2.50, WSH 3.41; score 1–3.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 2:44 AM

Kraken vs. Red Wings 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020066
#SeaKraken #LGRW #NHL #hockey

Seattle Kraken 6, Detroit Red Wings 3, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: SEA attacks the left net, DET the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals SEA 3.57, DET 4.03; shots on goal 24–40; attempts 53–82. The Kraken beat the Red Wings 6–3 on the road in a game the chances called about even, SEA 3.6 to DET 4.0 in expected goals. SEA scored 6 on 3.6 expected.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 2:44 AM

Kraken vs. Red Wings player stats (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Kraken, Berkly Catton +1.07 · Red Wings, Moritz Seider +1.58

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020066
#SeaKraken #LGRW #NHL #hockey

Seattle Kraken skaters, SEA 6–3 DET: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Berkly Catton +1.07 net xG (1.61 for, 0.54 against). Toughest: Adam Larsson −0.93 (0.53 for, 1.45 against).Detroit Red Wings skaters, DET 3–6 SEA: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Moritz Seider +1.58 net xG (2.19 for, 0.61 against). Toughest: Andrew Copp −1.25 (0.37 for, 1.62 against).Seattle Kraken lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Eberle – Stephenson – McMann 12 min together, −0.26 net xG; D1 Montour – Evans 20 min together, −0.01 net xG.Detroit Red Wings lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Larkin – Arvidsson – Raymond 14 min together, +0.82 net xG; D1 Seider – Johansson 16 min together, +1.24 net xG.
@pucksleuth.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 2:38 AM

Sleuth of the Night, Oct 9: Sergei Murashov +3.82. Top defenseman: Damon Severson +2.31. #NHL #SleuthRating #LetsGoPens #CBJ https://pucksleuth.com/schedule?date=2026-10-09

Sleuth of the Night card for Oct 9: the best and worst Sleuth Ratings by position.
@hockeystatcards.comOct 10, 2026, 2:36 AM

#NHL Game Score Impact Card for Anaheim Ducks on 2026-10-09:

#FlyTogether

Anaheim Ducks Impact Card
@hockeystatcards.comOct 10, 2026, 2:36 AM

#NHL Game Score Impact Card for Winnipeg Jets on 2026-10-09:

#GoJetsGo #NHLJets

Winnipeg Jets Impact Card
@evltwnhd1.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 2:19 AM

Morrissey would have made a difference tonight.
Strong start.
Need a strong finish.
#NHL #SN
#GOJETSGO✈️

Photo, no descriptionPhoto, no description
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 2:11 AM

Seattle Kraken 6, Detroit Red Wings 3
NHL · Oct 9, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Kraken 3.57, Red Wings 4.07

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020066
#SeaKraken #LGRW #NHL #hockey

Seattle Kraken 6, Detroit Red Wings 3, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: SEA attacks the left net, DET the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals SEA 3.57, DET 4.07; shots on goal 25–41; attempts 53–81. The Kraken beat the Red Wings 6–3 on the road in a game the chances called about even, SEA 3.6 to DET 4.1 in expected goals. SEA scored 6 on 3.6 expected.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative SEA minus DET xG, above zero when SEA is ahead on chances, below when DET is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG SEA 3.57, DET 4.07; score 6–3.
@hockeystatcards.comOct 10, 2026, 1:51 AM

#NHL Game Score Impact Card for Pittsburgh Penguins on 2026-10-09:

#LetsGoPens

Pittsburgh Penguins Impact Card
@hockeystatcards.comOct 10, 2026, 1:51 AM

#NHL Game Score Impact Card for Columbus Blue Jackets on 2026-10-09:

#CBJ

Columbus Blue Jackets Impact Card
@thehypewindow.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 1:43 AM

Tied 2-2 in overtime. One goal ends it, sudden death, and both teams have had their chances. Pittsburgh and Columbus are still alive on ESPN+.
#NHL @NHL

@penguins @cbj

https://www.hypewindow.com/watch/game/d40da2cf-c200-540b-a86e-d425d468c307?src=bsky

Hype Window alert card. Pittsburgh Penguins 2 @ Columbus Blue Jackets 2. Legacy, hype 86 out of 100.