Grilled Cheese

ExploreLog inSign up
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyCommunity StandardsHelpGet the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-15 19:58:26 EDT

PhotosVideosAllPeople
LatestRanked
Load more
@detroitredwings3.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 11:41 AM

Man… what was it like to see the Wings win?

#DetroitRedWings #HockeyTown #NHL #RedWingsNation #GoWings

Photo, no description
@novasport-cz.zpravobot.news.ap.brid.gyOct 10, 2026, 8:32 AM

Pasta proti Flyers ve skvělém čase? To si prostě nemůžete nechat ujít! 😍⁣
⁣
Předzápasové studio začíná už v 18:35 na Nova Action a Oneplay. 📺

#NovaSport | #NovaAction | #NHL

Photo, no descriptionPhoto, no description
@territoriohockey.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 6:45 AM

Partidos para hoy sábado 10 de octubre en la #NHL

Photo, no description
@territoriohockey.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 6:43 AM

Buenos días #HockeyAdictos!!!

Vamos a repasar los marcadores de los partidos jugados esta pasada noche en la #NHL

Photo, no description
@pucksleuth.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 6:33 AM

Nashville and Montréal trade, valued by PuckSleuth. Even by our numbers. #Preds #GoHabsGo #NHL https://pucksleuth.com/trades/2026-10-09-mtl-nsh

Nashville Predators and Montréal Canadiens trade card: what each team got, valued
@hockeystats.ioOct 10, 2026, 4:03 AM

Today's biggest games by playoff impact: TBL at NYI (8.8% swing), EDM at SJS (8.2% swing), ANA at CGY (7.7% swing), CBJ at STL (7.6% swing), LAK at VGK (7.5% swing).
https://hockeystats.io/game/543222
#NHL #NHLStats

NHL Playoff Stats highlight
@anaduckshistory.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 4:02 AM

10/10/2005: Corey Perry scores his first #NHL goal, in a 4-2 loss against the Edmonton Oilers.

Photo, no description
@anaduckshistory.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 4:01 AM

10/10/2002: In his first #NHL game, Stanislav Chistov sets a #NHLducks rookie record for most points in a game with 4, in a 4-3 win against the St. Louis Blues. He also became the youngest Ducks player to earn 4 points in a game, at 19 years and 176 days old.

Photo, no description
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:22 AM

Ducks vs. Jets 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: ANA attacks the left net, WPG the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; shots on goal 16–16; attempts 35–53. The Ducks beat the Jets 5–1 on the road in a game the chances called about even, ANA 2.5 to WPG 2.1 in expected goals. The Jets power play made 1.0 xG on 15 attempts.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:22 AM

Ducks vs. Jets player stats (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Ducks, Judd Caulfield +0.96 · Jets, Gabriel Vilardi +0.59

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks skaters, ANA 5–1 WPG: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Judd Caulfield +0.96 net xG (1.07 for, 0.11 against). Toughest: Pavel Mintyukov −0.80 (0.26 for, 1.06 against).Winnipeg Jets skaters, WPG 1–5 ANA: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Gabriel Vilardi +0.59 net xG (0.93 for, 0.34 against). Toughest: Vladislav Namestnikov −1.04 (0.28 for, 1.32 against).Anaheim Ducks lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Killorn – Greer – Poehling 10 min together, +0.43 net xG; D1 LaCombe – Warren 22 min together, +0.08 net xG.Winnipeg Jets lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Scheifele – Connor – Perfetti 21 min together, +0.57 net xG; D1 DeMelo – Samberg 15 min together, +0.31 net xG.
@xjawn.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:22 AM

Ducks vs. Jets 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: ANA attacks the left net, WPG the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; shots on goal 16–16; attempts 35–53. The Ducks beat the Jets 5–1 on the road in a game the chances called about even, ANA 2.5 to WPG 2.1 in expected goals. The Jets power play made 1.0 xG on 15 attempts.
@xjawn.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:22 AM

Ducks vs. Jets player stats (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Ducks, Judd Caulfield +0.96 · Jets, Gabriel Vilardi +0.59

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks skaters, ANA 5–1 WPG: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Judd Caulfield +0.96 net xG (1.07 for, 0.11 against). Toughest: Pavel Mintyukov −0.80 (0.26 for, 1.06 against).Winnipeg Jets skaters, WPG 1–5 ANA: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Gabriel Vilardi +0.59 net xG (0.93 for, 0.34 against). Toughest: Vladislav Namestnikov −1.04 (0.28 for, 1.32 against).Anaheim Ducks lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Killorn – Greer – Poehling 10 min together, +0.43 net xG; D1 LaCombe – Warren 22 min together, +0.08 net xG.Winnipeg Jets lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Scheifele – Connor – Perfetti 21 min together, +0.57 net xG; D1 DeMelo – Samberg 15 min together, +0.31 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1
NHL · Oct 9, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Ducks 2.55, Jets 2.10

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: ANA attacks the left net, WPG the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; shots on goal 16–16; attempts 35–53. The Ducks beat the Jets 5–1 on the road in a game the chances called about even, ANA 2.5 to WPG 2.1 in expected goals. The Jets power play made 1.0 xG on 15 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative ANA minus WPG xG, above zero when ANA is ahead on chances, below when WPG is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; score 5–1.
@xjawn.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1
NHL · Oct 9, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Ducks 2.55, Jets 2.10

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020069
#FlyTogether #GoJetsGo #NHL #hockey

Anaheim Ducks 5, Winnipeg Jets 1, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: ANA attacks the left net, WPG the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; shots on goal 16–16; attempts 35–53. The Ducks beat the Jets 5–1 on the road in a game the chances called about even, ANA 2.5 to WPG 2.1 in expected goals. The Jets power play made 1.0 xG on 15 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative ANA minus WPG xG, above zero when ANA is ahead on chances, below when WPG is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG ANA 2.55, WPG 2.10; score 5–1.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Penguins vs. Blue Jackets 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020068
#LetsGoPens #CBJ #NHL #hockey

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PIT attacks the left net, CBJ the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PIT 2.96, CBJ 4.91; shots on goal 22–45; attempts 49–83. The Blue Jackets beat the Penguins 3–2 in a shootout at home, and the chances agreed: CBJ out-created PIT 4.9–3.0 in expected goals. The Blue Jackets power play made 1.0 xG on 14 attempts.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Penguins vs. Blue Jackets player stats (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Penguins, Ben Kindel +0.54 · Blue Jackets, Charlie Coyle +1.90

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020068
#LetsGoPens #CBJ #NHL #hockey

Pittsburgh Penguins skaters, PIT 2–3 CBJ: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Ben Kindel +0.54 net xG (1.07 for, 0.53 against). Toughest: Trevor van Riemsdyk −1.85 (0.49 for, 2.34 against).Columbus Blue Jackets skaters, CBJ 3–2 PIT: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Charlie Coyle +1.90 net xG (2.94 for, 1.03 against). Toughest: Ryan Lomberg −0.11 (0.21 for, 0.32 against).Pittsburgh Penguins lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Crosby – Rust – Rakell 10 min together, −0.99 net xG; D1 Girard – Korczak 16 min together, −0.55 net xG.Columbus Blue Jackets lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Johnson – Knies – Fantilli 15 min together, +0.95 net xG; D1 Severson – Werenski 15 min together, +0.62 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Rangers vs. Capitals 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020067
#NYR #ALLCAPS #NHL #hockey

New York Rangers 1, Washington Capitals 3, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: NYR attacks the left net, WSH the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals NYR 2.52, WSH 3.41; shots on goal 22–26; attempts 50–50. The Capitals beat the Rangers 3–1 at home, and the chances agreed: WSH out-created NYR 3.4–2.5 in expected goals. The Rangers power play made 1.0 xG on 17 attempts.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 3:17 AM

Rangers vs. Capitals player stats (NHL · Oct 9, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Rangers, Adam Fox +1.20 · Capitals, Alex Ovechkin +1.00

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020067
#NYR #ALLCAPS #NHL #hockey

New York Rangers skaters, NYR 1–3 WSH: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Adam Fox +1.20 net xG (1.84 for, 0.64 against). Toughest: Sean Durzi −1.60 (0.37 for, 1.97 against).Washington Capitals skaters, WSH 3–1 NYR: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Alex Ovechkin +1.00 net xG (1.05 for, 0.05 against). Toughest: Martin Fehervary −0.58 (0.63 for, 1.21 against).New York Rangers lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Zibanejad – Lafrenière – Perreault 12 min together, +0.54 net xG; D1 Gavrikov – Fox 15 min together, +0.32 net xG.Washington Capitals lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Wilson – Tuch – Dubois 13 min together, −0.25 net xG; D1 Chychrun – Liljegren 15 min together, +0.10 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 10, 2026, 2:44 AM

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 3 (SO)
NHL · Oct 9, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Penguins 2.93, Blue Jackets 4.61

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020068
#LetsGoPens #CBJ #NHL #hockey

Pittsburgh Penguins 2, Columbus Blue Jackets 3, Oct 9, 2026. Full-rink shot map: PIT attacks the left net, CBJ the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals PIT 2.93, CBJ 4.61; shots on goal 22–45; attempts 49–83. The Blue Jackets beat the Penguins 3–2 in a shootout at home, and the chances agreed: CBJ out-created PIT 4.6–2.9 in expected goals. The Blue Jackets power play made 1.0 xG on 14 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative PIT minus CBJ xG, above zero when PIT is ahead on chances, below when CBJ is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG PIT 2.93, CBJ 4.61; score 2–3.