Grilled Cheese

ExploreLog inSign up
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyCommunity StandardsHelpGet the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-15 18:51:49 EDT

PhotosVideosAllPeople
LatestRanked
Load more
@photodog.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 8:56 AM

#Photography #blackandwhitephotography #sports #action #hockey #action #sportphotography
...and he scores!!!

Photo, no descriptionPhoto, no descriptionPhoto, no descriptionPhoto, no description
@photodog.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 8:51 AM

#Photography #blackandwhitephotography #sports #action #hockey #motionblurs #action #motion #sportphotography
Hockey match face-off and puck drop!

Photo, no descriptionPhoto, no descriptionPhoto, no descriptionPhoto, no description
@photodog.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 8:48 AM

#Photography #sports #action #hockey #motionblurs #action #motion #sportphotography
More hockey action blurs, this time in color

Photo, no descriptionPhoto, no descriptionPhoto, no descriptionPhoto, no description
@photodog.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 8:46 AM

#Photography #blackandwhitephotography #sports #action #hockey #motionblurs #action #motion #sportphotography
So I decided to venture into the arena of sports photography to capture some action shots - shooting my grandson's minor league hockey match!
Blurred these with a slow shutter speed.

Photo, no descriptionPhoto, no descriptionPhoto, no descriptionPhoto, no description
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 5:28 AM

Calgary Flames 1, Vancouver Canucks 4
NHL · Oct 3, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Flames 1.84, Canucks 2.79

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020033
#Flames #Canucks #NHL #hockey

Calgary Flames 1, Vancouver Canucks 4, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: CGY attacks the left net, VAN the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals CGY 1.84, VAN 2.79; shots on goal 24–26; attempts 62–62. The Canucks beat the Flames 4–1 at home, and the chances agreed: VAN out-created CGY 2.8–1.8 in expected goals. At 5v5: CGY 1.6, VAN 1.8.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative CGY minus VAN xG, above zero when CGY is ahead on chances, below when VAN is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG CGY 1.84, VAN 2.79; score 1–4.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 4:28 AM

Blues vs. Avalanche 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020032
#stlblues #GoAvsGo #Avalanche #NHL #hockey

St. Louis Blues 1, Colorado Avalanche 6, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: STL attacks the left net, COL the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals STL 1.76, COL 3.67; shots on goal 26–36; attempts 55–66. The Avalanche beat the Blues 6–1 at home, and the chances agreed: COL out-created STL 3.7–1.8 in expected goals. COL scored 6 on 3.7 expected.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 4:27 AM

Blues vs. Avalanche player stats (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Blues, Pavel Buchnevich +0.12 · Avalanche, Martin Necas +1.58

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020032
#stlblues #GoAvsGo #Avalanche #NHL #hockey

St. Louis Blues skaters, STL 1–6 COL: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Pavel Buchnevich +0.12 net xG (0.62 for, 0.51 against). Toughest: Philip Broberg −1.46 (0.35 for, 1.81 against).Colorado Avalanche skaters, COL 6–1 STL: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Martin Necas +1.59 net xG (1.88 for, 0.30 against). Toughest: Brett Kulak −0.51 (0.46 for, 0.97 against).St. Louis Blues lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Thomas – Holloway – Snuggerud 11 min together, +0.14 net xG; D1 Parayko – Broberg 16 min together, −1.32 net xG.Colorado Avalanche lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas 10 min together, +0.27 net xG; D1 Toews – Makar 9 min together, +0.47 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 4:14 AM

St. Louis Blues 1, Colorado Avalanche 6
NHL · Oct 3, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Blues 1.76, Avalanche 3.67

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020032
#stlblues #GoAvsGo #Avalanche #NHL #hockey

St. Louis Blues 1, Colorado Avalanche 6, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: STL attacks the left net, COL the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals STL 1.76, COL 3.67; shots on goal 26–36; attempts 55–66. The Avalanche beat the Blues 6–1 at home, and the chances agreed: COL out-created STL 3.7–1.8 in expected goals. COL scored 6 on 3.7 expected.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative STL minus COL xG, above zero when STL is ahead on chances, below when COL is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG STL 1.76, COL 3.67; score 1–6.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 4:14 AM

Bruins vs. Wild 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020031
#NHLBruins #mnwild #NHL #hockey

Boston Bruins 1, Minnesota Wild 4, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: BOS attacks the left net, MIN the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals BOS 2.61, MIN 2.39; shots on goal 27–29; attempts 50–49. The Wild beat the Bruins 4–1 at home in a game the chances called about even, BOS 2.6 to MIN 2.4 in expected goals. The Wild power play made 0.8 xG on 9 attempts.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 4:14 AM

Bruins vs. Wild player stats (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Bruins, David Pastrnak +0.66 · Wild, Maxim Shabanov +0.75

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020031
#NHLBruins #mnwild #NHL #hockey

Boston Bruins skaters, BOS 1–4 MIN: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: David Pastrnak +0.66 net xG (1.54 for, 0.88 against). Toughest: William Borgen −0.60 (0.52 for, 1.12 against).Minnesota Wild skaters, MIN 4–1 BOS: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Maxim Shabanov +0.75 net xG (1.13 for, 0.38 against). Toughest: Daemon Hunt −0.63 (0.09 for, 0.72 against).Boston Bruins lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Lindholm – Pastrnak – Peterka 11 min together, −0.33 net xG; D1 Lindholm – Borgen 16 min together, −0.40 net xG.Minnesota Wild lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Foligno – Foligno – McCarron 10 min together, +0.14 net xG; D1 Brodin – Maatta 17 min together, −0.04 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:47 AM

Boston Bruins 1, Minnesota Wild 4
NHL · Oct 3, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Bruins 2.55, Wild 2.38

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020031
#NHLBruins #mnwild #NHL #hockey

Boston Bruins 1, Minnesota Wild 4, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: BOS attacks the left net, MIN the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals BOS 2.55, MIN 2.38; shots on goal 27–29; attempts 50–49. The Wild beat the Bruins 4–1 at home in a game the chances called about even, BOS 2.5 to MIN 2.4 in expected goals. The Wild power play made 0.8 xG on 9 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative BOS minus MIN xG, above zero when BOS is ahead on chances, below when MIN is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG BOS 2.55, MIN 2.38; score 1–4.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:47 AM

Stars vs. Predators 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020030
#TexasHockey #Smashville #Preds #NHL #hockey

Dallas Stars 1, Nashville Predators 2, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: DAL attacks the left net, NSH the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals DAL 2.20, NSH 2.28; shots on goal 30–26; attempts 65–52. The Predators beat the Stars 2–1 at home in a game the chances called about even, DAL 2.2 to NSH 2.3 in expected goals. At 5v5: DAL 1.7, NSH 1.9.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:46 AM

Stars vs. Predators player stats (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Stars, Jason Robertson +0.50 · Predators, Filip Forsberg +0.58

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020030
#TexasHockey #Smashville #Preds #NHL #hockey

Dallas Stars skaters, DAL 1–2 NSH: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Jason Robertson +0.50 net xG (1.03 for, 0.53 against). Toughest: Justin Hryckowian −0.62 (0.60 for, 1.22 against).Nashville Predators skaters, NSH 2–1 DAL: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Filip Forsberg +0.58 net xG (0.95 for, 0.38 against). Toughest: Nick Perbix −0.48 (0.75 for, 1.24 against).Dallas Stars lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Rantanen – Johnston – Hryckowian 8 min together, −0.32 net xG; D1 Lundkvist – Harley 15 min together, −0.16 net xG.Nashville Predators lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Stamkos – O'Reilly – Kerfoot 10 min together, +0.04 net xG; D1 Josi – Hague 17 min together, −0.21 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:46 AM

Devils vs. Islanders 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020029
#NJDevils #Isles #NHL #hockey

New Jersey Devils 0, New York Islanders 6, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: NJD attacks the left net, NYI the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals NJD 3.52, NYI 3.75; shots on goal 37–32; attempts 72–50. The Islanders beat the Devils 6–0 at home in a game the chances called about even, NJD 3.5 to NYI 3.7 in expected goals. NYI scored 6 on 3.7 expected.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:46 AM

Devils vs. Islanders player stats (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Devils, Nico Hischier +1.10 · Islanders, Matthew Schaefer +1.47

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020029
#NJDevils #Isles #NHL #hockey

New Jersey Devils skaters, NJD 0–6 NYI: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Nico Hischier +1.10 net xG (1.81 for, 0.71 against). Toughest: Amadeus Lombardi −0.98 (0.23 for, 1.21 against).New York Islanders skaters, NYI 6–0 NJD: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Matthew Schaefer +1.47 net xG (2.04 for, 0.57 against). Toughest: Ryan Pulock −1.15 (0.61 for, 1.77 against).New Jersey Devils lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Meier – Hischier – Evangelista 9 min together, +0.42 net xG; D1 Hamilton – Siegenthaler 17 min together, +0.61 net xG.New York Islanders lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Pageau – Duclair – Holmstrom 9 min together, −0.14 net xG; D1 Pelech – Schaefer 11 min together, +0.78 net xG.
@stormzovkreation.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:39 AM

#NHL #Hockey #Sports #Standings #Statistics 🏒🏆🏒

Photo, no description
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:16 AM

Dallas Stars 1, Nashville Predators 2
NHL · Oct 3, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Stars 2.20, Predators 2.28

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020030
#TexasHockey #Smashville #Preds #NHL #hockey

Dallas Stars 1, Nashville Predators 2, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: DAL attacks the left net, NSH the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals DAL 2.20, NSH 2.28; shots on goal 30–26; attempts 65–52. The Predators beat the Stars 2–1 at home in a game the chances called about even, DAL 2.2 to NSH 2.3 in expected goals. At 5v5: DAL 1.7, NSH 1.9.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative DAL minus NSH xG, above zero when DAL is ahead on chances, below when NSH is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG DAL 2.20, NSH 2.28; score 1–2.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:16 AM

New Jersey Devils 0, New York Islanders 6
NHL · Oct 3, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Devils 3.57, Islanders 3.78

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020029
#NJDevils #Isles #NHL #hockey

New Jersey Devils 0, New York Islanders 6, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: NJD attacks the left net, NYI the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals NJD 3.57, NYI 3.78; shots on goal 37–32; attempts 72–50. The Islanders beat the Devils 6–0 at home in a game the chances called about even, NJD 3.6 to NYI 3.8 in expected goals. NYI scored 6 on 3.8 expected.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative NJD minus NYI xG, above zero when NJD is ahead on chances, below when NYI is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG NJD 3.57, NYI 3.78; score 0–6.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:16 AM

Canadiens vs. Penguins 5-on-5 matchups (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020026
#GoHabsGo #LetsGoPens #NHL #hockey

Montréal Canadiens 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 6, Oct 3, 2026. Full-rink shot map: MTL attacks the left net, PIT the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals MTL 3.13, PIT 2.78; shots on goal 25–30; attempts 69–51. The Penguins beat the Canadiens 6–5 in overtime at home in a game the chances called about even, MTL 3.1 to PIT 2.8 in expected goals. PIT scored 6 on 2.8 expected.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialOct 4, 2026, 3:16 AM

Canadiens vs. Penguins player stats (NHL · Oct 3, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Canadiens, Nick Suzuki +1.77 · Penguins, Tommy Novak +0.72

https://xjawn.com/games/2026020026
#GoHabsGo #LetsGoPens #NHL #hockey

Montréal Canadiens skaters, MTL 5–6 PIT: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Nick Suzuki +1.77 net xG (2.20 for, 0.42 against). Toughest: Kirby Dach −0.66 (0.11 for, 0.77 against).Pittsburgh Penguins skaters, PIT 6–5 MTL: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Tommy Novak +0.72 net xG (1.23 for, 0.51 against). Toughest: Trevor van Riemsdyk −1.08 (0.15 for, 1.23 against).Montréal Canadiens lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Kreider – Suzuki – Caufield 11 min together, +0.93 net xG; D1 Matheson – Dobson 14 min together, −0.38 net xG.Pittsburgh Penguins lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Crosby – Rakell – Robertson 11 min together, +0.11 net xG; D1 Girard – Korczak 16 min together, −0.41 net xG.