Grilled Cheese

ExploreLog inSign up
Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyCommunity StandardsHelpGet the app

Grilled Cheese is a product of Village Compute

Version devBuilt at: 2026-10-13 09:58:44 EDT

Explore

PostsPeople
LatestRanked
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 26, 2026, 11:57 PM

Colorado Avalanche 0, Utah Mammoth 2
NHL preseason · Sep 26, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Avalanche 2.12, Mammoth 4.92

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010054
#GoAvsGo #Avalanche #UtahHockey #NHL #hockey

Colorado Avalanche 0, Utah Mammoth 2, Sep 26, 2026 (preseason). Full-rink shot map: COL attacks the left net, UTA the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals COL 2.12, UTA 4.92; shots on goal 25–35; attempts 48–75. The Mammoth beat the Avalanche 2–0 at home, and the chances agreed: UTA out-created COL 4.9–2.1 in expected goals. The Mammoth power play made 2.4 xG on 23 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative COL minus UTA xG, above zero when COL is ahead on chances, below when UTA is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG COL 2.12, UTA 4.92; score 0–2.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 25, 2026, 5:18 AM

Mammoth vs. Golden Knights 5-on-5 matchups (NHL preseason · Sep 24, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010047
#UtahHockey #VegasBorn #NHL #hockey

Utah Mammoth 4, Vegas Golden Knights 5, Sep 24, 2026 (preseason). Full-rink shot map: UTA attacks the left net, VGK the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals UTA 1.70, VGK 3.30; shots on goal 21–35; attempts 38–77. The Golden Knights beat the Mammoth 5–4 in overtime at home, and the chances agreed: VGK out-created UTA 3.3–1.7 in expected goals. UTA scored 4 on 1.7 expected.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 25, 2026, 5:17 AM

Mammoth vs. Golden Knights player stats (NHL preseason · Sep 24, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Mammoth, Yegor Borikov +0.29 · Golden Knights, Shea Theodore +2.34

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010047
#UtahHockey #VegasBorn #NHL #hockey

Utah Mammoth skaters, UTA 4–5 VGK: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Yegor Borikov +0.29 net xG (0.69 for, 0.40 against). Toughest: Nate Schmidt −0.92 (0.09 for, 1.01 against).Vegas Golden Knights skaters, VGK 5–4 UTA: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Shea Theodore +2.34 net xG (2.55 for, 0.20 against). Toughest: Rasmus Andersson −0.81 (0.25 for, 1.05 against).Utah Mammoth lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Yamamoto – Hayton – McBain 11 min together, −0.21 net xG; D1 DeSimone – Duda 15 min together, −0.64 net xG.Vegas Golden Knights lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Karlsson – Marner – Howden 8 min together, +0.35 net xG; D1 McNabb – Theodore 17 min together, +1.20 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 25, 2026, 5:17 AM

Utah Mammoth 4, Vegas Golden Knights 5 (OT)
NHL preseason · Sep 24, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Mammoth 1.70, Golden Knights 3.30

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010047
#UtahHockey #VegasBorn #NHL #hockey

Utah Mammoth 4, Vegas Golden Knights 5, Sep 24, 2026 (preseason). Full-rink shot map: UTA attacks the left net, VGK the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals UTA 1.70, VGK 3.30; shots on goal 21–35; attempts 38–77. The Golden Knights beat the Mammoth 5–4 in overtime at home, and the chances agreed: VGK out-created UTA 3.3–1.7 in expected goals. UTA scored 4 on 1.7 expected.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative UTA minus VGK xG, above zero when UTA is ahead on chances, below when VGK is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG UTA 1.70, VGK 3.30; score 4–5.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 25, 2026, 12:13 AM

Mammoth vs. Kings 5-on-5 matchups (NHL preseason · Sep 22, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010030
#UtahHockey #GoKingsGo #NHL #hockey

Utah Mammoth 6, Los Angeles Kings 3, Sep 22, 2026 (preseason). Full-rink shot map: UTA attacks the left net, LAK the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals UTA 3.26, LAK 2.70; shots on goal 34–22; attempts 59–43. The Mammoth beat the Kings 6–3 on the road in a game the chances called about even, UTA 3.3 to LAK 2.7 in expected goals. The Mammoth power play made 1.1 xG on 11 attempts.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 25, 2026, 12:13 AM

Mammoth vs. Kings player stats (NHL preseason · Sep 22, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Mammoth, Clayton Keller +1.18 · Kings, Artemi Panarin +0.90

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010030
#UtahHockey #GoKingsGo #NHL #hockey

Utah Mammoth skaters, UTA 6–3 LAK: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Clayton Keller +1.18 net xG (1.52 for, 0.34 against). Toughest: Cam Hebig −1.32 (0.25 for, 1.58 against).Los Angeles Kings skaters, LAK 3–6 UTA: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Artemi Panarin +0.90 net xG (1.33 for, 0.44 against). Toughest: Kirill Kirsanov −0.87 (0.48 for, 1.35 against).Utah Mammoth lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Lee – Guenther – Cooley 10 min together, −0.07 net xG; D1 Weegar – Sergachev 11 min together, +0.13 net xG.Los Angeles Kings lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Kempe – Panarin – Byfield 13 min together, +0.96 net xG; D1 Anderson – Clarke 15 min together, +0.10 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 25, 2026, 12:13 AM

Utah Mammoth 6, Los Angeles Kings 3
NHL preseason · Sep 22, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Mammoth 3.26, Kings 2.70

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010030
#UtahHockey #GoKingsGo #NHL #hockey

Utah Mammoth 6, Los Angeles Kings 3, Sep 22, 2026 (preseason). Full-rink shot map: UTA attacks the left net, LAK the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals UTA 3.26, LAK 2.70; shots on goal 34–22; attempts 59–43. The Mammoth beat the Kings 6–3 on the road in a game the chances called about even, UTA 3.3 to LAK 2.7 in expected goals. The Mammoth power play made 1.1 xG on 11 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative UTA minus LAK xG, above zero when UTA is ahead on chances, below when LAK is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG UTA 3.26, LAK 2.70; score 6–3.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 24, 2026, 11:39 PM

Mammoth vs. Avalanche 5-on-5 matchups (NHL preseason · Sep 20, 2026)
Every head-to-head skater pairing: who won the xG while they shared the ice, and for how long.

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010012
#UtahHockey #GoAvsGo #Avalanche #NHL #hockey

Utah Mammoth 1, Colorado Avalanche 4, Sep 20, 2026 (preseason). Full-rink shot map: UTA attacks the left net, COL the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals UTA 2.54, COL 2.27; shots on goal 24–17; attempts 47–49. The Avalanche beat the Mammoth 4–1 at home in a game the chances called about even, UTA 2.5 to COL 2.3 in expected goals. The Mammoth power play made 1.0 xG on 11 attempts.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 24, 2026, 11:39 PM

Mammoth vs. Avalanche player stats (NHL preseason · Sep 20, 2026)
Every skater's on-ice xG, plus forward lines and defense pairs.
Best on-ice xG: Mammoth, Daniil But +0.87 · Avalanche, Domenick Fensore +0.83

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010012
#UtahHockey #GoAvsGo #Avalanche #NHL #hockey

Utah Mammoth skaters, UTA 1–4 COL: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Daniil But +0.87 net xG (1.36 for, 0.49 against). Toughest: Nick DeSimone −0.37 (0.59 for, 0.96 against).Colorado Avalanche skaters, COL 4–1 UTA: every skater's on-ice expected goals for (right of zero) and against (left), best net first, ice time under each name. Best: Domenick Fensore +0.83 net xG (1.02 for, 0.19 against). Toughest: Brent Burns −0.91 (0.27 for, 1.18 against).Utah Mammoth lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Trocheck – Crouse – Yamamoto 10 min together, +0.61 net xG; D1 Marino – Duda 12 min together, +0.21 net xG.Colorado Avalanche lines and defence pairs, detected from 5-on-5 shifts: when each unit was on the ice across the game clock, and its on-ice expected goals for and against. L1 Nelson – Schwartz – Hughes 12 min together, +0.40 net xG; D1 Burns – Behrens 12 min together, −0.52 net xG.
@xjawn-gamer.bsky.socialSep 24, 2026, 11:39 PM

Utah Mammoth 1, Colorado Avalanche 4
NHL preseason · Sep 20, 2026
Expected goals (xG): Mammoth 2.54, Avalanche 2.27

https://xjawn.com/preseason/games/2026010012
#UtahHockey #GoAvsGo #Avalanche #NHL #hockey

Utah Mammoth 1, Colorado Avalanche 4, Sep 20, 2026 (preseason). Full-rink shot map: UTA attacks the left net, COL the right; every attempt marked, goals as crosses, over a heat map of expected-goal rate versus a typical team per 60 (orange above, blue below). Expected goals UTA 2.54, COL 2.27; shots on goal 24–17; attempts 47–49. The Avalanche beat the Mammoth 4–1 at home in a game the chances called about even, UTA 2.5 to COL 2.3 in expected goals. The Mammoth power play made 1.0 xG on 11 attempts.Net expected goals over the game: one line of cumulative UTA minus COL xG, above zero when UTA is ahead on chances, below when COL is, each goal a vertical line at its time and power-play time shaded in the side's colour. Final xG UTA 2.54, COL 2.27; score 1–4.